1989
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198908000-00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraarticular Versus Intraarticular and Extraarticular Reconstruction for Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined reconstructions did not provide additional stability. Similar clinical results were obtained where no demonstrable benefit with combined stabilization procedures for chronic ACL instability was found (Anderson et al, 2001;Strum et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The combined reconstructions did not provide additional stability. Similar clinical results were obtained where no demonstrable benefit with combined stabilization procedures for chronic ACL instability was found (Anderson et al, 2001;Strum et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Many studies have already investigated the role of such extraarticular procedures. 5,6,[8][9][10]29,30 Anderson et al, 31 as well as Roth et al, 5 showed no improvement by the addition of an extra-articular procedure. Completely …”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Because of limitations of current intra-articular techniques and inability to fully restore normal knee kinematics, insufficient anterolateral structures may play a role in residual knee laxity. 1,3,4 The role of extra-articular procedures improving knee stability has been a matter of debate, especially with regard to the rotational component (glide), and although authors such as Roth et al, 5 Strum et al, 6 and Barrett et al 7 found no significant improvements with the use of extra-articular plasty, Lerat et al, 8 Noyes et al, 9 and Zaffagnini et al 10 found increased success rates with the addition of an extra-articular procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hace varias décadas se comenzó a utilizar la tenodesis extraarticular aislada (81)(82)(83)(84) , controlando de forma efectiva la inestabilidad rotacional pero ejerciendo solamente un moderado control sobre la inestabilidad anteroposterior con resultados pobres a largo plazo. Además, se observó un aumento de cambios degenerativos en el compartimento lateral de la rodilla (85,86) . Posteriormente, se pasó a la reconstrucción intraarticular transtibial del LCA mediante fascí-culo único, convirtiéndose en el gold estándar, con una orientación más vertical de la misma, mejorando en este caso la inestabilidad anteroposterior, pero con resultados pobres en el control de la inestabilidad rotacional (87,88) .…”
Section: Tratamientounclassified