1992
DOI: 10.3109/asl2.1992.20.issue-2.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Subject Variability and the Effect of Speech Task on Vocal Fundamental Frequency of Young Adult Australian Males and Females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, in multiple studies, the primary predictor for an observer to judge a voice as feminine was fundamental frequency . The mean fundamental frequency (F 0 ) for adult females is 196 to 224 Hz with a range of 145 to 275 Hz, and the mean F 0 for adult males is 107 to 146 Hz with a range of 80 to 165 Hz . Voices with mean F 0 between 155 and 160 Hz are within a borderline range that may be perceived as male or female …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, in multiple studies, the primary predictor for an observer to judge a voice as feminine was fundamental frequency . The mean fundamental frequency (F 0 ) for adult females is 196 to 224 Hz with a range of 145 to 275 Hz, and the mean F 0 for adult males is 107 to 146 Hz with a range of 80 to 165 Hz . Voices with mean F 0 between 155 and 160 Hz are within a borderline range that may be perceived as male or female …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4 The mean fundamental frequency (F 0 ) for adult females is 196 to 224 Hz with a range of 145 to 275 Hz, and the mean F 0 for adult males is 107 to 146 Hz with a range of 80 to 165 Hz. [5][6][7] Voices with mean F 0 between 155 and 160 Hz are within a borderline range that may be perceived as male or female. [9][10][11] In cases for which voice therapy fails to achieve satisfactory voice change, several surgical approaches have gained popularity for elevating vocal pitch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergvall 1999 briefly discusses how popular interpretations of sex-based behavioral differences are explained in terms of physical differences. Certainly, the difference between men's and women's vocal fold length would account for the almost uniform finding that the average pitch in adult men is lower than in women (Weaver 1924, Snidecor 1951, Linke 1973, Coleman 1976, Lass, Hughes et al 1976, Loveday 1981, Günzburger 1984, Gilmore et al 1992. But if differences in pitch are purely physiological, this could not account for the better-than-chance ability to distinguish between the voices of preadolescent boys and girls, whose physical articulatory properties and average pitch are similar (Weinberg & Zlatin 1970, Weinberg & Bennett 1971, Sachs, Lieberman & Erickson 1973, Bennett & Weinberg 1979a, 1979b, Bresser & Günzburger 1985, Günzburger, Bresser & ter Keurs 1987, Lee, Hewlett & Nairn 1995.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males have a lower average pitch, use a smaller pitch range, and show less pitch variability than females. [1][2][3][4][5][6] It has also been suggested that gay male speech mirrors the patterns of women's speech. [7][8][9] It is not clear, however, to what extent gay males show pitch patterns that resemble those of females.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%