2017
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2017.1296323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-household gender division of labour and decision-making on rice postharvest handling practices: A case of Eastern Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding however is contrary to Lusiba et. al., (2017) assertion that, assigning key home based activities to women who are already overburdened with domestic chores compromise their inefficiency in performing activities such as adequate drying which is critical for reduction of post-harvest losses.…”
Section: Malecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding however is contrary to Lusiba et. al., (2017) assertion that, assigning key home based activities to women who are already overburdened with domestic chores compromise their inefficiency in performing activities such as adequate drying which is critical for reduction of post-harvest losses.…”
Section: Malecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Rice processing requires special skills since large percentages of broken rice are not desirable in commercial packages (Okunola, Adekanye, Adewumi, and Ashamu, 2019). As noted by Lusiba, Kibwika and Kyazze (2017), rice postharvest handling activities are manual, labour intensive, tedious, slow and time consuming compared to other crops such as maize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They target a household as a single agent on the assumption that individuals within the household share the same preferences or that the household head acts in the best interest of the family (Meijer et al, 2015;Rogan, 2013). This assertion is however contestable, with studies showing that individuals in the household have different preferences Lusiba et al, 2017;Meijer et al, 2015). As a result, agroforestry decisions made by one member may not consider all the different interests of the household members (Haider, Smale, & Theriault, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the entertainment element embedded in the video more youth attended the video shows (Karubanga et al, 2017). Thus, the use of videos in training can enhance diversity of farmers attending and learning from age mix; which is critical in providing labour during the implementation of the acquired knowledge related to postharvest handling practices and technologies (Ssebaggala et al, 2017). Because of its inherent positive attributes such as clarity of images, demonstration ability and fostering of interactions, to some extent the video has enhanced learning among farmers without formal education (14%) as they were able to see and hear what was being demonstrated (Bede Lauréano, 2016; Karubanga et al, 2017).…”
Section: Viewing and Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical review of the video content coupled with the farmers' observations revealed that most of the demonstrations on the practices and technologies were basically performed by women. Given the already existing triple chores of women, the content might send an inclined message regarding gender roles and responsibilities in maize postharvest handling (Ssebaggala et al, 2017). Thus, paying attention to this perceived gender-related concern during the development of farmer videos would allow for more equitable involvement of both genders in postharvest handing and management.…”
Section: Farmer Evaluation Of Influence Of Video Attributes On Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%