2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.014405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-atomic noncollinear magnetism and the magnetic structures of antiferromagnetic FeMn

Abstract: Both collinear and noncollinear magnetic structures of FeMn with L1 0 atomic ordering were determined from total-energy full-potential linearized augmented plane-wave calculations incorporating noncollinear magnetism with no shape approximation for the magnetization density. Different spin-density orientations for the different band states are observed on a smaller length scale inside an atom. The presence of the intra-atomic noncollinear magnetism enhances the stability of the 3Q noncollinear magnetic structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominant Fe 3d components are indicated by symbols when the ratio of component is larger than 0.1. These indications present a partial preservation of properties in the Fe monolayer [24,28]. There are many regions modified by the hybridization with the non-magnetic metal atoms; d 3z 2 −r 2 components atX below the Fermi level, d xz,yz atX −Γ line smears out below the Fermi level again, and d x 2 −y 2 aroundX becomes below the Fermi level, and so on.…”
Section: Angular Components For Ldosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant Fe 3d components are indicated by symbols when the ratio of component is larger than 0.1. These indications present a partial preservation of properties in the Fe monolayer [24,28]. There are many regions modified by the hybridization with the non-magnetic metal atoms; d 3z 2 −r 2 components atX below the Fermi level, d xz,yz atX −Γ line smears out below the Fermi level again, and d x 2 −y 2 aroundX becomes below the Fermi level, and so on.…”
Section: Angular Components For Ldosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of these eigenproblems forces the use of direct methods, such as those included in LAPACK or ScaLAPACK [20,21]. All of the most com-mon simulation codes implementing the FLAPW method (WIEN2k, FLEUR, FLAIR, Exciting, ELK [7][8][9][10][11]), despite successfully simulating complex materials [12][13][14][15], treat each eigenproblem of the series of iterative cycles in isolation. This implies that no information embedded in the solution of eigenproblems in one cycle is used to speed up the computation of problems in the next.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the spin state of bulk FeMn can take either a collinear or non-collinear configuration [51][52][53][54] , the spin configuration in an ultrathin film may differ from that of the bulk, especially when it interacts with FM or HM like Pt. In the case of FeMn/FM bilayer, it has been observed experimentally that the spin axis of FeMn is aligned to that of the FM layer from the interface [55][56][57] .…”
Section: Macro-spin Model Of the Femn Layermentioning
confidence: 99%