2019
DOI: 10.1055/a-0747-5333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and Interdevice Deviation of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Abstract: Purpose To compare 4 optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCT-A) devices for foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements in healthy subjects. Methods The central retinas of 24 eyes of 12 healthy subjects were scanned with 4 different OCT-A devices (Optovue RTVue-XR, Zeiss Cirrus 5000-HD-OCT, a prototype Spectralis OCT2, Heidelberg Engineering, and Topcon DRI-OCT Triton Swept-source OCT). For the Topcon, Zeiss, and Optovue devices, 3-mm and 6-mm scans were performed. The Heidelberg device only provi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, vessel measures may vary greatly and cannot be transferred interchangeably between OCT-A devices. 21 In the present study, we did not see any clear longitudinal alteration of the DVC in eyes with or without past ON, suggesting that deep retinal vessels might be rather not affected during and after ON.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Here, vessel measures may vary greatly and cannot be transferred interchangeably between OCT-A devices. 21 In the present study, we did not see any clear longitudinal alteration of the DVC in eyes with or without past ON, suggesting that deep retinal vessels might be rather not affected during and after ON.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…This small and opposing effect of scaling is due to the average axial length of our cohort being slightly greater than the assumed axial length of the AngioVue device but slightly less than the assumed axial length of the AngioPlex device. Taken together, our findings suggest that previously reported differences in FAZ area between different OCT-A devices 15,16,18,19,22,23,52 are most likely due to different postprocessing methods inherent to the devices as opposed to fundamental differences in the images themselves. Additionally, it is possible that the axial length characteristics of the subjects in earlier studies differed relative to the device(s) used, which would affect the reported relative differences in FAZ area between devices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Previous studies have shown that errors in image scale 27 , 51 and differing segmentation methods 19 , 38 can affect measurements of FAZ area. 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 52 Strengths of our study are that: (1) we used manual segmentation of the FAZ contour and (2) we used the subject's axial length and knowledge of the assumed axial for each device to derive the image scale for each OCT-A image. This approach allowed us to isolate the impact of the OCT-A device on FAZ metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the appearance of OCTA image data strongly depends on details of the OCT device, scan protocols, signal processing, and algorithms used to generate OCTA information from structural OCT data. [36] Therefore, the results presented must not be directly transferred to other OCTA devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%