2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2022.133222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Into higher dimensions for nonsmooth dynamical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approximation (32) (and hence (33)) captures the slow arcs of the exact flow (22) (or (26)) increasingly well as x increases, as shown in Fig. 11.…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Slow Dynamics) the Dynamics Onmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approximation (32) (and hence (33)) captures the slow arcs of the exact flow (22) (or (26)) increasingly well as x increases, as shown in Fig. 11.…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Slow Dynamics) the Dynamics Onmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For large x in (22), it becomes impossible to separate out the fast oscillation of the sin(π x(1 + 1 2 u)) term from the slow-fast timescale separation created by small ε. Hence the slow dynamics depends not just on the small parameter ε, but also crucially on the largeness of the time x.…”
Section: Slow Dynamics For Large X: Large and Small Arcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on different arguments methods may result in different sliding mode equations. Methods 1, 2 and 6 are compared in (Utkin, 1971(Utkin, , 1972, Methods 1,4 and 6 in (Jeffrey et al, 2022;Polyakov & Fridman, 2014). The question, which is correct, is not legitimate-all equations were postulated.…”
Section: Equivalent Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, authors have demonstrated that there exist conditions for which the use of smoothing functions is admissible and produce commensurate and acceptable dynamic responses [53,54]; nonetheless, more recent studies have highlighted how such regularisations can create ambiguities [55]. Jeffrey et al [56] suggested that the nature of such ambiguities is precisely the nonuniqueness of the solution which induces the generation of a set of solutions at the discontinuity border. Each of these solutions is equally valid but represents only a portion of the system dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these solutions is equally valid but represents only a portion of the system dynamic response. Nevertheless, in some cases the Hidden Dynamics [57] of the sliding solutions 3 could be missed: in fact, the adopted regularisation (see Examples 1 and 2 of [56]) and solution method (see Example 1 of [57]) can deeply affect the solution of the system. If the solution method can only miss the hidden attractors, the regularisation can affect their existence by preserving the nonlinear properties of discontinuity boundary [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%