2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interweaving local, expert, and Indigenous knowledge into quantitative wildlife analyses: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We favored a simple set of ILK indicators in our analysis, drawing on brief answers to three questions. Integrating culturally based knowledge that is qualitative, multi-causal, and holistic, within the reductionist nature of scientific knowledge can be hazardous 20,26 . Still, repeated observations based on intricate relationships with the environment are also one face of Indigenous knowledge 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We favored a simple set of ILK indicators in our analysis, drawing on brief answers to three questions. Integrating culturally based knowledge that is qualitative, multi-causal, and holistic, within the reductionist nature of scientific knowledge can be hazardous 20,26 . Still, repeated observations based on intricate relationships with the environment are also one face of Indigenous knowledge 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, interweaving knowledge is fraught with challenges, inherent to the encounter of different cultures, worldviews, languages, priorities, and the power relations that have tainted these encounters for so long 20,21 . Considering the increasingly quantitative nature of environmental studies, there are also specific challenges to interweaving ILK and quantitative analysis in respectful ways 20,26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Alexander et al (2021) and Stern and Humphries (2022), both identified various types of methodology approaches taken that have been emphasized to be pivotal in the succession of the co‐production arrangement. Alexander et al (2021) highlighted that the occurrence of community‐based participatory research was common, while Stern and Humphries (2022) highlighted the importance of community consent from Indigenous Peoples and regular communication throughout the duration of the project. While these past studies have looked at case studies of bridging Indigenous knowledge and Western science together in their own respective disciplines, it is to our knowledge that there has not been a systematic map done for co‐production in caribou conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent systematic reviews have outlined both challenges and solutions with practical applications for improvement. For instance, Alexander et al (2021) and Stern and Humphries (2022), both identified various types of methodology approaches taken that have been emphasized to be pivotal in the succession of the co‐production arrangement. Alexander et al (2021) highlighted that the occurrence of community‐based participatory research was common, while Stern and Humphries (2022) highlighted the importance of community consent from Indigenous Peoples and regular communication throughout the duration of the project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in Peru and Bolivia, ILK provides accurate information about the water cycle (Oshun et al., 2021), El Niño events (based on the brightness of stars in the Pleiades) (Orlove et al., 2000), and weather patterns (based on plant and animal indicators) (Boillat & Berkes, 2013). It also provides information about ecological processes, such as plant and animal population trends and distribution, ecosystem functions, and evolutionary processes (Jessen et al., 2021; McElwee et al., 2020; Stern & Humphries, 2022). Ethnoecology, a scientific field focusing on the study of the relationships between human societies and their environment, demonstrates how ILK varies depending on social and cultural groups, for instance, in the way people name animals and plants and value the environmental role of species, use biodiversity, implement governance system to govern their access to and use of biodiversity, and integrate biodiversity in the worldviews and cosmologies that guide peoples’ ethics (Cámara‐Leret & Dennehy, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%