2015
DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2015.1028544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes

Abstract: The interviewing of suspects is an important element in the investigation of crime.However, studies concerning actual performance of investigators when undertaking such interviews remain sparse. Nevertheless, in England and Wales, since the introduction of a prescribed framework over twenty years ago, field studies have

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
52
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, almost half of the investigators planned to use a strategic disclosure mode for each critical piece of evidence. These findings are consistent with the outcome of previous studies conducted in England and Wales (e.g., Smith & Bull, ; Walsh & Bull, ). This is not surprising considering that the current sample consisted of investigators from countries that have adopted an information gathering approach to suspect interviewing (KREATIV in Norway, Fahsing & Rachlew, ; The General Interview Strategy in the Netherlands, Hoekendijk & van Beek, ; PEACE model in England and Wales, Milne & Bull, ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, almost half of the investigators planned to use a strategic disclosure mode for each critical piece of evidence. These findings are consistent with the outcome of previous studies conducted in England and Wales (e.g., Smith & Bull, ; Walsh & Bull, ). This is not surprising considering that the current sample consisted of investigators from countries that have adopted an information gathering approach to suspect interviewing (KREATIV in Norway, Fahsing & Rachlew, ; The General Interview Strategy in the Netherlands, Hoekendijk & van Beek, ; PEACE model in England and Wales, Milne & Bull, ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It could be argued that in self‐report studies, investigators may provide answers that are socially desirable; thus, these responses may not fully reflect their behavior in real life. However, this concern may be unfounded because the findings from archival studies examining investigators' evidence use in various countries (in the United States, Leo, ; in Australia, Sellers & Kebbell, ; in the UK, Walsh & Bull, ) were in line with the findings obtained from investigators' self‐reports in the same countries (in the United States, Kassin et al, ; in Australia, Smith & Bull, ; in the UK, Walsh et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by using think aloud methodologies). Recent research on developing effective strategies when interviewing suspects has emphasised the importance of developing an interview strategy (Dando et al 2015;Hartwig et al 2005aHartwig et al , b, 2006Hartwig et al , 2007van der Sleen 2009;Walsh and Bull 2015). The necessity to plan interviews should not be overlooked, being as important as other investigative tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading questions, which the PEACE model discourages (Walsh & Bull, ) in the United Kingdom, are also a possible breach of Sections 76 and 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Clarke & Milne, ). Leading questions are generally observed infrequently in interviews conducted by officers in the United Kingdom (Clarke et al, ; Read, Powell, Kebbell, Milne, & Steinberg, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%