Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?

Wimpenny, Peter; Gass, John

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x

Cited by 274 publications

(210 citation statements)

References 29 publications

(43 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

189

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The difference between these two approaches can be seen in how each uses the technique of interviewing. In a phenomenological study, in-depth interviews are a key means of probing individuals' subjective experiences (Wimpenny & Gass, 2000). The detail and nuance of the stories interviewees elaborate and the specific words they choose comprise the primary unit of analysis.…”

Section: Grounded Theory Is Not Presentation Of Raw Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not

Suddaby

2006

AMJ

2,027

1,561

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Grounded Theory Is Not Presentation Of Raw Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not

Suddaby

2006

AMJ

2,027

1,561

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Interviews are an efficient way of gathering rich empirical data (Wimpenny and Gass, 2000). Our semi-structured format probed the women's subjective experiences of career advancement and career/family balance.…”

Section: Interview Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Career advancement and family balance strategies of executive women

Ezzedeen

Ritchey²

2009

Gender in Management: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explore coping strategies devised by executive women in family relationships to advance their career and to maintain careerlfamily balance. Design/methodology/approach -A qualitative methodology using a sample of 25 executive women explores career advancement and careerlfamily balance strategies within work and family contexts. Findings -Analysis produces multiple career advancement and careerlfamily balance strategies, including professional support, personal support, value system, and life course strategies such as the "ordering" of career and family, negotiating spousal support, and whether to have children. Research limitations/implications -Adaptive strategies facilitate engagement in career and family, even in challenging gender environments, encouraging continued research on executive women's advancement and careerlfamily balance. The idiosyncratic nature of careerlfamily balance calls for greater emphasis on the context and timing of career and family experiences. Practical implications -The paper offers guidance to women seeking to combine executive career and family and to organizations committed to the advancement and retention of women. Originality/value -The paper jointly explores career advancement and careerlfamily balance strategies pursued by executive women in family relationships. It contributes to a growing body of research on the coping mechanisms and adaptive strategies underlying balance between career and family.

show abstract

“…The data on focus group will be analyzed based on thematic analysis. Based on two process of thematic analysis, theme emerge will be further explore and interview will be discontinued once the theme has saturated (Wimpenny & Gass, 2000). Atlas.ti.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development of Driver's Evaluation in Malaysia: A concept paper

Masuri

Dahlan

Danis

et al. 2018

jABs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Road traffic accident (RTA) frequently involves multi-level society and this has become a demanding community issue where more serious participation is needed to improve driver's attitude in the future. RTA has a significant impact on quality of life and financial burden to the government and Malaysian society. Currently, there is limited local evidence supporting the elements of driver's attitudes. This concept paper will discuss a potential method to be used in developing valid and sensitive driver's evaluation. This evaluation may help the government of Malaysia to produce better road users in the future) Masuri, M.G., et.al. / Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies (jABs), 3(9) Jul / Aug 2018 (p.141-148) 142 IntroductionAccident involving road transport has a momentous impact on person, government and our society. According to Malaysian Institute of Road Safety (MIROS), a model has been predicted the fatalities for the year 2015 are 8,760, while for the year of 2020 will be increased to 10,716 (Sarani, Rahim, Jamilah Mohd Marjan, & Wong Shaw Voon, 2012). The number of RTA is increasing and addresses significant demands for better action. Many studies had proven that, drivers factor was identified as a significant contribution to RTA. Driving is an intricate daily activity that involves active eye, hand and foot coordination. Drivers who fail to organize and interact with the machine and environment may lead to road traffic injury (RTI) . According to (Alert Driving Megazine, 2011), 90% of road traffic accidents were caused by human error. This made the human error as an important ergosystem component that need to be further investigate. Road users who use the road either for leisure or work purposes usually exposed to the risk of accident/injury. With regards to driving assessment, there are many drivers related assessment available worldwide and these they were varies from one and another. Literature ReviewValid and reliable assessment is vital. It will help to determine appropriate intervention and rehabilitation plan. Unfortunately, there is no local assessment available to assess Malaysian driver's attitude towards safe driving behavior. It is impossible to create single attitude assessment related to driving that fits to all due to the complexity of human behavior including driving activity itself, yet 'local norm' related to high/low risk drivers should be establish as fundamental references for further research. Many studies has proven that, attitudes rarely present the synchronize behavior. Attitudes can be presented either in positive or negative form. Even though attitude and behavior were not usually straightforward and they are sensitive according to social situation, but, attitude assessment can be used to predict future behavior (Iversen, 2004). Attitude also has significant relationship with our beliefs (Eagly, Mladinic, & Otto, 1994). According to (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993), attitudes can be defined as "…tendency to evaluate an entity with some degree of favor or disfavor, ordinaril...

show abstract

Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?

Cited by 274 publications

References 29 publications

From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not

From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not

Career advancement and family balance strategies of executive women

The Development of Driver's Evaluation in Malaysia: A concept paper

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About