From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not

Suddaby, Roy

doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020

Cited by 2,027 publications

(1,701 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,561

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To answer these questions, we initially took a traditional theoretical approach to volunteering in sports events, that of individual motivations (see the literature review in section 1.2). However, as data collection and analysis continued in this exploratory study, we found that the existing literature, which focused largely around the psychology of individual motivation, did not adequately explain what was occurring (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007;Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2014;Suddaby, 2006). In exploring alternative explanations, RUNNING HEAD: «We can do it»: Long-term volunteering in sport 4 we drew upon a Durkheimian perspective which enabled us to shift the focus away from the individual level and towards broader social processes, particularly but not exclusively at the community level (see theoretical framework).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event

Kristiansen

Skirstad

Parent

et al. 2015

Sport Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event

Kristiansen

Skirstad

Parent

et al. 2015

Sport Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Comme Glaser (2002) le fait ressortir, la théorisation enracinée ne cherche pas à décrire une réalité ni à dépeindre le portrait d'un phénomène, elle cherche avant tout à générer une théorie ; au-delà de la description, elle vise l'abstraction, la conceptualisation. Certains ont cependant soulevé le problème de la conception « puriste » de la théorisation enracinée selon laquelle le chercheur doit faire table rase des théories existantes, et ce faisant analyser les données sans ancrage théorique initial (Sudabby, 2006). De façon plutôt pragmatique, Strauss et Corbin (1998) ont orienté leurs travaux sur le développement de procédures d'analyse de données.…”

Section: Une Démarche De Théorisation Enracinéeunclassified

L’identification collective d’opportunités

Tremblay

2014

ipme

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Editions EMS -In Quarto SARL ISSN 0776-5436 (imprimé) 1918-9699 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Tremblay, M. (2014). L'identification collective d'opportunités : La créativité au service de l'entrepreneuriat. Revue internationale P. M.E., 27(1), 99-124. doi:10.7202/1025691ar Résumé de l'article Pour plusieurs aspirants entrepreneurs, trouver une « bonne » opportunité est une étape difficile. Arriver à reconnaître une opportunité nécessite, au niveau individuel, un certain nombre de connaissances et d'informations, de même qu'une certaine dose de créativité. Pour pallier ces limites individuelles, une avenue intéressante est de mettre à contribution des groupes ou une collectivité pour identifier des opportunités, ce qui permet de multiplier les connaissances et favorise la créativité. C'est le pari qui a été fait dans certains milieux, en réunissant différents groupes d'acteurs dans des démarches structurées afin de reconnaître des opportunités dans leur environnement. Bien qu'intéressantes, ces démarches posent la question suivante :

show abstract

“…People can use the same words and phrases, such as grounded theory, critical theory, or hermeneutics, and can be referring to completely different ideas and procedures. Suddaby (2006), in an editorial note, complained, "'grounded theory' is often used as rhetorical sleight of hand by authors who are unfamiliar with qualitative research and who wish to avoid close description or illumination of their methods" (p. 633). Although Suddaby lays out a nice framework for grounded theory researchers to proceed, the same admonition would apply to nearly every technique of qualitative research.…”

Section: Minimize Obfuscation!mentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualitative Researchers, Heal (and Help) Thyself Too

Zickar

2016

Ind. Organ. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A persistent lament by qualitative organizational researchers is that qualitative research is not published, published enough, cited enough, or valued by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists. Pratt and Bonaccio (2016) present convincing data that there has been an increase in the visibility of qualitative studies throughout many organizational research journals, though some of the flagship journals in I-O psychology are less receptive. Also, they present a series of suggestions that largely entail ways that journal editors and nonqualitative researchers can adapt their attitudes and behaviors to help qualitative research have more of an impact. I agree with those suggestions and think that they should be pursued. On the other hand, I was disappointed that none of the suggestions presented by Pratt and Bonaccio offered things that qualitative researchers might do to make their research more impactful to I-O psychologists. For qualitative research to have a bigger impact in the organizational literature, qualitative researchers need to make changes as well. In this short commentary, I propose three things that qualitative researchers might do to improve their impact within the field of I-O psychology. Collaborate With Quantitative ResearchersThere is a tendency in our field (and all of academia in general) to specialize. Although notable exceptions exist, many of the I-O researchers advocating qualitative research conduct qualitative research almost exclusively. In many ways, they are methods focused as opposed to problem focused (the same criticism can certainly be applied to many quantitative researchers). Most research questions, however, do not break down neatly into problems that are best solved by either quantitative or qualitative methods but would

show abstract

From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not

Cited by 2,027 publications

References 29 publications

‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event

‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event

L’identification collective d’opportunités

Qualitative Researchers, Heal (and Help) Thyself Too

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About