2016
DOI: 10.4073/csr.2016.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions for promoting reintegration and reducing harmful behaviour and lifestyles in street‐connected children and young people: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(586 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is challenging to situate our study among other interventions studies with this population because of the heterogeneity of the studies (e.g., different outcomes and self-report scales) and because the majority these studies include-often exclusively-young people who are still experiencing homelessness (see recent review by Morton et al [10]). Additionally, as noted by our study participants, interventions with this population tend to primarily focus on treating mental health or targeting behavior change (e.g., substance use) [7,9,10], not specifically targeting identity capital. That said, there are some transferrable comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is challenging to situate our study among other interventions studies with this population because of the heterogeneity of the studies (e.g., different outcomes and self-report scales) and because the majority these studies include-often exclusively-young people who are still experiencing homelessness (see recent review by Morton et al [10]). Additionally, as noted by our study participants, interventions with this population tend to primarily focus on treating mental health or targeting behavior change (e.g., substance use) [7,9,10], not specifically targeting identity capital. That said, there are some transferrable comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Findings from the handful of longitudinal studies examining the life-trajectories of young people after they have become "successfully housed" are concerning-most remain socially and economically excluded, struggle to shake off identities of homelessness, and just one misstep away from returning to the streets [3][4][5]. Moreover, evidence-based solutions designed with the primary aim of addressing inclusion-related challenges among this population are scarce [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaikų, paauglių, jaunų žmonių rizikingos elgsenos problemas įvairiais aspektais tyrė daugelis šalies ir užsienio mokslininkų [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Tarptautiniai tyrimai rodo, kad rizikinga elgsena glaudžiai susijusi su psichoaktyviųjų medžiagų vartojimu (piktnaudžiavimu alkoholiu, narkotinėmis medžiagomis, rūkymu) [18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…However, due to the paucity of evidence, neither the UN resolution nor the Kenya Care Reform strategy provides evidence to support the perspective that SICY can be successfully reintegrated with families of origin or foster families. A 2016 global review of literature presenting interventional effectiveness of programs designed to reintegrate SICY found no studies measuring inclusion and reintegration of SICY anywhere in the world, and no studies exploring interventional outcomes of programs in low- or middle-income countries ( Coren et al, 2016 ). Evidence-informed strategies are required to ensure that children living on the streets are not simply placed back in abusive or unstable families they fled when they initially migrated to the streets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%