2001
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/58.15.1428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions and documentation for drug-related problems in Dutch community pharmacies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Netherlands, pharmacies documented their activities as a result of prospective computerised medication review; 38% of all interventions resulting from computer generated alerts or other forms of professional assessments led to a change in the prescription or patient education activities. These interventions represented over 9% of all prescriptions dispensed 27 . Buurma et al found that 4.9% of prescriptions for prescription-only medicines (mean 14.3 per pharmacy per day) were modified in the Netherlands to prevent or correct drug-related problems 28 .…”
Section: Drug Misadventuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, pharmacies documented their activities as a result of prospective computerised medication review; 38% of all interventions resulting from computer generated alerts or other forms of professional assessments led to a change in the prescription or patient education activities. These interventions represented over 9% of all prescriptions dispensed 27 . Buurma et al found that 4.9% of prescriptions for prescription-only medicines (mean 14.3 per pharmacy per day) were modified in the Netherlands to prevent or correct drug-related problems 28 .…”
Section: Drug Misadventuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutch pharmacists have experience in consulting physicians concerning individual patients' medication as a consequence of medication surveillance 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRPs were coded according to the Problem Intervention Documentation (PIDoc) system [25,26]. The original PI-Doc system has two levels of classification (problem analysis and intervention recommendation) [1,9,25] whereby a code for a problemsolving intervention is allocated to each code for a DRP. The open hierarchical structure of the classification system made it possible to allocate DRPs to one of six predefined major problem categories: ADRs, drug interactions, inappropriate The modified version of the PI-Doc used in this study has a third level of classification that covers the intervention outcome: improving patient's status of health, increasing patient's safety and drug regimen adjustment [27].…”
Section: Classification Of Drug-related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing awareness of DRPs and their detrimental effect on patients' health [6,7] has led to a number of studies of pharmaceutical care services [8][9][10][11]. However, although Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly population, very few such studies exist in this area [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%