2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventional bipartite consensus on coopetition networks with unknown dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [33], bipartite consensus, which means that the states of the agents converge to a final state with the same magnitude but opposite sign, was introduced under a structurally balanced signed graph. Then, there has been a surge of attention given to the research of bipartite consensus of multi‐agent systems [34–43], because of its theoretical significance and potential applications. In [35], the interval bipartite consensus was introduced, and it was shown that a multi‐agent system can reach interval bipartite consensus when the signed digraph contains a directed spanning tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [33], bipartite consensus, which means that the states of the agents converge to a final state with the same magnitude but opposite sign, was introduced under a structurally balanced signed graph. Then, there has been a surge of attention given to the research of bipartite consensus of multi‐agent systems [34–43], because of its theoretical significance and potential applications. In [35], the interval bipartite consensus was introduced, and it was shown that a multi‐agent system can reach interval bipartite consensus when the signed digraph contains a directed spanning tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [37], an equivalence relationship between bipartite consensus and traditional consensus was founded, and the bipartite consensus of linear multi‐agent system was investigated by both state and output feedback control. In [38], the interventional bipartite consensus was addressed for a high‐order multi‐agent system with unknown disturbance by using a neural network technique. In [42], by taking into account the dynamic leader with non‐zero control input unavailable to any follower, the bipartite tracking consensus of linear multi‐agent systems was investigated under undirected signed graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is very natural to see, in many real examples, that in MASs some agents cooperate while others compete, and MASs with competitive interactions can introduce more complex behaviors. To quantitatively model such a scenario, the concept of bipartite consensus, i.e., agents agree on a certain quantity with the equal modulus but different signs, has been proposed [9], and many achievements have been made [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In [9], for singleintegrator MASs, a linear feedback protocol is designed and under the assumption that the communication topology G is strongly connected, the MAS is proved to achieve bipartite consensus if and only if G is structurally balanced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fixed communication topology in [8] is extended in [12] to time-varying signed digraphs. Moreover, bipartite consensus for high-order MASs with unknown disturbances is investigated [15][16][17]. In [15], an adaptive consensus protocol is designed for second-order MASs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], an adaptive consensus protocol is designed for second‐order MASs. In [16, 17], for high‐order MASs, a leader, whose information is only available to a part of agents, is introduced to intervene a group of agents and a neural network‐based adaptive protocol is proposed. Since a Lyapunov function candidate is usually hard to be constructed for high‐order MASs, a common Lyapunov function method is employed in the convergence analysis [16, 17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%