1979
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.19.6433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersubband scattering effect on the mobility of a Si (100) inversion layer at low temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that ∆n s contributed from the interfacial Si increases the 2DEG sheet concentration to the level where higher subbands may be populated. And then, as predicted by the intersubband scattering model [11,13], the RT Hall mobility rapidly declines. This behaviour, which is correlated to the proximity of the 2DEG channel to the bulk GaN/epitaxial interface is in agreement with Mori's prediction [11] of the scattering of electrons between subbands that should occur when more than one electron subband is occupied.…”
Section: CMmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This suggests that ∆n s contributed from the interfacial Si increases the 2DEG sheet concentration to the level where higher subbands may be populated. And then, as predicted by the intersubband scattering model [11,13], the RT Hall mobility rapidly declines. This behaviour, which is correlated to the proximity of the 2DEG channel to the bulk GaN/epitaxial interface is in agreement with Mori's prediction [11] of the scattering of electrons between subbands that should occur when more than one electron subband is occupied.…”
Section: CMmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the second variational step, we obtain the k and spin dependent eigenfunctions Ψ hk (z) of the total HamiltonianH = H L + V (z) for the HH1 sub-band by expanding Ψ hk (z) in terms of the lowest eigenstates ofH for k = 0, whenH becomes diagonal. For the k = 0 HH1 and LH1 states we use the zero-node wave functions (11) with v = h, l. For the one-node HH2, LH2 states we use the form 48,62 …”
Section: A Luttinger Hamiltonian For 2dhgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single modulation doped heterostructure is usually approximated by a simple triangular quantum well and trial wave functions are used. 26 However, this approach may result in a large error in the calculated 2D scattering rates. In order to investigate the error introduced by this approach, we compared the 2D polar optical phonon scattering rates obtained using trial wave functions with those calculated by the exact wave functions.…”
Section: D Polar Optical Phonon Scattering Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%