2000
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-78-5-600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of <i>Castilleja</i> <i>linariaefolia</i> pollen on seed set of <i>Ipomopsis</i> <i>aggregata</i>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the order of receipt of Euphorbia pollen may be important, as shown by the trend in the 2005 greenhouse study toward decreased seed set only when Euphorbia pollen is received prior to Viola pollen. For natural pollen receipt, conspecific pollen may be received first or simultaneously with heterospecific pollen, and similar to the trend in this study, other studies have found that heterospecific pollen reduces fecundity only if received prior to conspecific pollen (Waser and Fugate 1986;Caruso and Alfaro 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the order of receipt of Euphorbia pollen may be important, as shown by the trend in the 2005 greenhouse study toward decreased seed set only when Euphorbia pollen is received prior to Viola pollen. For natural pollen receipt, conspecific pollen may be received first or simultaneously with heterospecific pollen, and similar to the trend in this study, other studies have found that heterospecific pollen reduces fecundity only if received prior to conspecific pollen (Waser and Fugate 1986;Caruso and Alfaro 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Several studies in other systems (Waser 1978;Galen and Gregory 1989;Murphy and Aarssen 1995;Caruso and Alfaro 2000;Brown and Mitchell 2001) have found reduced fecundity resulting from heterospecific pollen receipt, as found here for Viola in the greenhouse. However, other studies have found no significant reduction in reproductive success with heterospecific pollen receipt (Campbell and Motten 1985;Armbruster and McGuire 1991;Kwak and Jennersten 1991), and it remains an ongoing challenge to determine what traits of pollen and recipient flowers lead heterospecific pollen to cause decreased fecundity (Murphy 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…From the female perspective, further study is required to fully understand fitness consequences. Foreign pollen may block the stigmatic surface or clog the staminal column (Armbruster & Herzig 1984;Caruso & Alfaro 2000;Brown & Mitchell 2001), or it may fertilize ovules, leading to the production of inviable seeds or unfit hybrid offspring (Arnold & Hodges 1995). It should be noted that, from either the male or the female perspective, competition through interspecific pollen transfer differs from more traditional forms of competition in that the fitness costs will be experienced regardless of whether or not pollinators are a limiting resource.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this idea, a recent meta-analysis of pollination studies demonstrated a global pattern in that plants in regions with the greatest species richness face the highest levels of pollen limitation ( Vamosi et al 2006). When multiple species share the same guild of pollinators, visitation patterns can lead to competition through interspecific pollen transfer (sensu Waser 1983), a form of reproductive interference (sensu Armbruster et al 1994) that imposes fitness costs, such as pollen loss to foreign stigmas and stigma blockage by foreign pollen (Campbell & Motten 1985;Caruso & Alfaro 2000;Brown & Mitchell 2001). Competition through interspecific pollen transfer differs from traditional forms of competition in that the pollinator 'resource' need not be limiting for the negative effects to be manifested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diferentes estudios observaron efectos negativos en la adecuación de las plantas cuando el polen interespecífico se depositó antes del polen conespecífico (Caruso & Alfaro, 2000) aunque esto depende de cada especie (Hao et al, 2023;Streher et al, 2020). Es probable que la transferencia de polen interespecífico durante esta primera hora reduzca las posibilidades de la existencia de estos efectos negativos en la adecuación de nuestras especies.…”
Section: Proporción De Flores Con Depósito De Análogos De Polenunclassified