1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00235.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific microsatellite markers for the study of pinniped populations

Abstract: Microsatellites have rapidly become the marker of choice for a wide variety of population genetic studies. Here we describe 20 pinniped microsatellite markers which have been tested across 18 pinniped species. The majority of these markers have broad utility in all pinnipeds and provide a strong base for detailed population genetic studies in the Pinnipedia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not surprising since male 36 is the son of male 7. Before accepting the CERVUS assignment result in this case, we further genotyped these four individuals at two X-linked loci (Lw-18; Davis et al 2002 and Pv 17;Gemmell et al 1997). Paternal alleles being necessarily transmitted to the female progeny, we were able to determine that 7 is the true father as 36 could not have contributed the paternal allele at either X-linked locus.…”
Section: Parentage and Pedigree Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not surprising since male 36 is the son of male 7. Before accepting the CERVUS assignment result in this case, we further genotyped these four individuals at two X-linked loci (Lw-18; Davis et al 2002 and Pv 17;Gemmell et al 1997). Paternal alleles being necessarily transmitted to the female progeny, we were able to determine that 7 is the true father as 36 could not have contributed the paternal allele at either X-linked locus.…”
Section: Parentage and Pedigree Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered 94 published pinniped microsatellite primers (Allen, 1995;Allen et al, 1995;Coltman et al, 1996;Gemmell et al, 1997;Goodman, 1997Goodman, , 1998Buchanan et al, 1998;Davis et al, 2002;HernandezVelaquez et al, 2005;Hayes et al, 2006;Hoffman et al, 2006;Wolf et al, 2006). Of these, 38 had previously been tested on four harbour seals from Scotland and were dismissed because they were either monomorphic or failed to amplify.…”
Section: Microsatellite Locus Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kretzmann et al [20] describe only three mitochondrial haplotypes in 50 individuals. Gemmell et al [21] survey 18 pinnipeds at 20 microsatellite loci and find the Hawaiian monk seal to have the lowest genetic diversity, with only three polymorphic loci. Its genetic diversity is even lower than that of the Mediterranean monk seal (M. monachus, polymorphic at 12 loci), of which only ~400 individuals remain [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gemmell et al [21] survey 18 pinnipeds at 20 microsatellite loci and find the Hawaiian monk seal to have the lowest genetic diversity, with only three polymorphic loci. Its genetic diversity is even lower than that of the Mediterranean monk seal (M. monachus, polymorphic at 12 loci), of which only ~400 individuals remain [21]. Schultz et al [22] identify only seven variable microsatellite loci of 143 isolated from the Hawaiian monk seal genome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%