2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific egg rejection as ecological collateral damage from selection driven by conspecific brood parasitism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike some host species that have evolved defensive behaviors (e.g., egg rejection) to brood parasitism (Lyon et al. , Medina and Langmore ), the Wood Thrush readily accepts cowbird eggs providing us with the unique ability to evaluate the effects of large‐scale population trends in Wood Thrushes and cowbirds without the potentially confounding factors that arise due to defensive behavioral adaptations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike some host species that have evolved defensive behaviors (e.g., egg rejection) to brood parasitism (Lyon et al. , Medina and Langmore ), the Wood Thrush readily accepts cowbird eggs providing us with the unique ability to evaluate the effects of large‐scale population trends in Wood Thrushes and cowbirds without the potentially confounding factors that arise due to defensive behavioral adaptations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have proposed the alternative hypothesis, that intraspecific brood parasitism is the reason why the northern masked weaver (Ploceus taeniopterus) rejects eggs (Freeman, 1988;Jackson, 1992b); this hypothesis could apply to the Rüppell's weaver as well, in the absence of evidence. The agent of selection cannot be determined by the mere existence of egg rejection, as selection from intraspecific brood parasitism can lead to rejection of heterospecific eggs (Lyon et al, 2015), and vice versa (Lahti, 2006). The evidence that intraspecific brood parasitism alone can promote the evolution of egg rejection is fairly uncontroversial (Lyon and Eadie, 2004).…”
Section: Egg Rejection and Implications For Brood Parasitismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refinement of egg appearance traits and egg recognition is especially necessary because the diederik cuckoo has evolved mimicry of weaver eggs (Payne, 1967), and diverged into apparent egg races, or gentes, that are specialized on different host egg morphs (Jensen and Vernon, 1970). In some weavers, individuals parasitize each other (Jackson, 1992a), which is not as detrimental as cuckoo parasitism as it merely adds an individual to the clutch; nevertheless it might still impose selection for egg recognition (Samaš et al, 2014;Lyon et al, 2015). At least in the village weaver, however, defensive traits function especially in response to interspecific (cuckoo) brood parasitism, as demonstrated by their decay in the absence of the cuckoo (Lahti, 2005(Lahti, , 2006, and the subsequent evolution of egg appearance in accordance with other agents of selection in populations freed from cuckoo parasitism (Lahti, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where social parasites do occur, they have usually evolved to evade pre-existing recognition systems (e.g., social parasites in eusocial hymenoptera, and transmissible cancers in vertebrates; table A3). In certain birds, variability of egg shell patterns may have evolved in response to conspecific brood parasitism, and incidentally helped protect against interspe-cific brood parasitism (Samas et al 2014;Lyon et al 2015). In other cases, social parasites evolve in taxa that lack association preference systems (e.g., clams and red algae; table A3).…”
Section: Major Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%