1970
DOI: 10.2307/1933654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific Competition Between Drosophila Melanogaster and Drosophila Simulans: Effects of Larval Density on Viability, Developmental Period and Adult Body Weight

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
60
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Most eggto-adult viabilities reported here are between 60% and 80%, which corresponds to the range typically seen in laboratory lines of Drosophila, especially considering that these flies have been maintained as inbred lines for a significant amount of time and that the F 1 flies are sib-mated (e.g., Barker and Podger 1970;Poinsot and Merçot 1997;Van 'T Land et al 1999;Hercus and Hoffmann 2000;Kern et al 2001;Charlesworth et al 2004;Rodríguez-Ramilo et al 2004). Furthermore, while egg-to-adult viability is technically large enough to account for the observed deviations, differences in male/female viability would have to be dramatic to gen-erate the observed results.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). Most eggto-adult viabilities reported here are between 60% and 80%, which corresponds to the range typically seen in laboratory lines of Drosophila, especially considering that these flies have been maintained as inbred lines for a significant amount of time and that the F 1 flies are sib-mated (e.g., Barker and Podger 1970;Poinsot and Merçot 1997;Van 'T Land et al 1999;Hercus and Hoffmann 2000;Kern et al 2001;Charlesworth et al 2004;Rodríguez-Ramilo et al 2004). Furthermore, while egg-to-adult viability is technically large enough to account for the observed deviations, differences in male/female viability would have to be dramatic to gen-erate the observed results.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The possible effects of larval crowding (Alpatov 1930;Barker and Podger 1970;Roper et al 1996), measured as the inverse of the number of adults scored from a single bottle, was not correlated with female proportions (r 2 ϭ 1.66 ϫ 10 Ϫ7 , P ϭ 0.998).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The bottles were 200-ml bottles containing 35 ml of the standard oatmealsugar-yeast-agar medium. The level of larval density was moderate and within the range considered to be optimal for developing D. melanogaster cultures (Barker and Podger 1970) in all bottles. The number of flies emerging from the bottles was not significantly different across the three treatments (noninbred: 356 6 6, fast inbreeding: 387 6 11; slow inbreeding: 357 6 28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, Comfort (1968) has argued that 'the only likely way of prolonging vigour will prove to be through stretching the development programme as a whole'. The developmental period of Drosophila can be prolonged through manipulation of temperature (Powsner, 1935) and larval density (Barker & Podger, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%