Abstract:Objective. To describe an intersession remediation process in an accelerated three-year Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) program and to determine if the remediation process reduced attrition rates, including program withdrawals, progression to advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs), and on-time graduation rates. Methods. Attrition was defined as dismissal, withdrawal, leave of absence, and/or change in graduation date. Progression data from students who matriculated between 2008 to 2016, with data available… Show more
“…Their findings revealed that students who enrolled in remedial courses demonstrated better academic performance than those who did not participate. Esposito et al ( 2019 ) conducted a study investigating the effects of a rigorous 2-week remediation program for students who had failed a final exam with a score that fell 10% or less below the cutoff grade. The program required eligible students to sign a written contract outlining a concentrated study plan that thoroughly assessed their strengths and weaknesses.…”
Background: Universities are responsible for providing education and support to all students, including those who may be underachieving. To fulfill this responsibility, universities need effective strategies to help these students graduate successfully.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a midterm remedial exam strategy in improving the academic performance of nursing students.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed to conduct this research at a private college in Dammam, Saudi Arabia’s eastern region. The study included 306 convenient bachelor nursing students who had failed their midterm exam. Of these, 103 students voluntarily participated in the remedial midterm exam (intervention group) to enhance their midterm scores, while 203 students did not take the remedial exam (control group). Data collection took place in the spring of 2022 by reviewing course files and student records, encompassing formative and summative evaluations across 14 courses. Data analysis involved using SPSS (2023) and Jamovi (version 2.3, 2022) software to conduct paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney, and correlational tests.
Results: The remedial group demonstrated significant differences between their midterm and remedial exam scores. However, only 15.5% of students in the remedial group passed the exam, despite 68% showing improvement. Additionally, there were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in midterm and overall course scores. The control group outperformed the remedial group in the midterm, final exams, and overall course scores (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Remedial exams can be beneficial for students who are close to passing but may not effectively support those who perform poorly. To address this, implementing a comprehensive remedial program or providing ongoing remedial activities throughout the course can offer better support for strongly underperforming students. Additionally, educational institutions can enhance students’ motivation and performance by providing study skills classes and time-management workshops, equipping them with valuable tools for academic success.
“…Their findings revealed that students who enrolled in remedial courses demonstrated better academic performance than those who did not participate. Esposito et al ( 2019 ) conducted a study investigating the effects of a rigorous 2-week remediation program for students who had failed a final exam with a score that fell 10% or less below the cutoff grade. The program required eligible students to sign a written contract outlining a concentrated study plan that thoroughly assessed their strengths and weaknesses.…”
Background: Universities are responsible for providing education and support to all students, including those who may be underachieving. To fulfill this responsibility, universities need effective strategies to help these students graduate successfully.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a midterm remedial exam strategy in improving the academic performance of nursing students.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed to conduct this research at a private college in Dammam, Saudi Arabia’s eastern region. The study included 306 convenient bachelor nursing students who had failed their midterm exam. Of these, 103 students voluntarily participated in the remedial midterm exam (intervention group) to enhance their midterm scores, while 203 students did not take the remedial exam (control group). Data collection took place in the spring of 2022 by reviewing course files and student records, encompassing formative and summative evaluations across 14 courses. Data analysis involved using SPSS (2023) and Jamovi (version 2.3, 2022) software to conduct paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney, and correlational tests.
Results: The remedial group demonstrated significant differences between their midterm and remedial exam scores. However, only 15.5% of students in the remedial group passed the exam, despite 68% showing improvement. Additionally, there were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in midterm and overall course scores. The control group outperformed the remedial group in the midterm, final exams, and overall course scores (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Remedial exams can be beneficial for students who are close to passing but may not effectively support those who perform poorly. To address this, implementing a comprehensive remedial program or providing ongoing remedial activities throughout the course can offer better support for strongly underperforming students. Additionally, educational institutions can enhance students’ motivation and performance by providing study skills classes and time-management workshops, equipping them with valuable tools for academic success.
“…An analysis of the intersession remediation strategy and rates of attrition at SU COPHS has been previously published. 4 The impact of intersession remediation as compared with course repeat or any other progression strategy on academic outcomes of interest, including professional licensure examinations, is not well-described in the literature. This may result from lack of standardization of remediation policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available data appear to be in favor of a remediation model that offers individualized or focused support to students who are struggling, and this is included as a component of our intersession remediation strategy. 4 In a 2019 study by Coelho and colleagues, struggling dental students who accepted optional academic remediation based on poor performance on a progress examination had improved academic profiles compared to students who declined remediation. 6 A 2013 systematic review by Cleland and colleagues, which included 31 studies on remediation interventions for mostly medical students, noted the rarity of control/comparison groups, long-term followup measures, conceptual frameworks, and adequate sample sizes in the studies examined.…”
Objective. To compare Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) scaled scores and North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) pass rates in students who completed a twoweek intersession remediation or repeated a course with the scaled scores and pass rates of students who did not require any form of didactic remediation and did not have to repeat a course. Methods. Data examined for this study included NAPLEX/PCOA scores, NAPLEX pass/fail status, and remediation history for students at one college of pharmacy. Students from the graduating classes of 2016, 2017, and 2018 were organized into four groups: non-remediation, one course remediation and no repeats, more than one course remediation and no repeats, and one or more course repeats. Differences were analyzed using linear regression, logistic regression, and Pearson correlations. Results. The PCOA scores for students in the remediation groups were significantly lower than scores for students in the non-remediation groups, with a reduction of 37.8 to 50.9 points from the expected non-remediators' score. The NAPLEX scores for students who remediated more than one course or repeated one or more courses were 16-20 points lower compared to students who did not remediate. The likelihood of a student failing the NAPLEX was also not significantly lower for students who remediated one course but was significantly lower for other remediation groups. Conclusion. Although single course remediation in this curricular model appears to have minimal impact on NAPLEX outcomes and may be an acceptable intervention for many students, additional support and interventions may be warranted for students who qualify for remediation in multiple courses and/or for repeating a course.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.