2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11196-015-9421-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersemiotic Complementarity in Legal Cartoons: An Ideational Multimodal Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim was to improve students' understanding of how different modes interact to make meaning in ideological and creative ways, in order to critically evaluate the message of the cartoons. In line with Royce (2015), who also analysed legal cartoons following a systemic functional approach and a social-semiotic perspective, Wawra's paper puts this framework into action, taking it to the language classroom and carefully selecting a number of political cartoons that the students can easily relate to. The model developed by Wawra in a learning environment also illustrates the concept of "visually encoded and contextually loaded intersemiotic interaction" identified by Royce (2015, p. 721), and is relevant for independent and proficient users (B1 to C2 in the CEFR).…”
Section: The Contributions To This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim was to improve students' understanding of how different modes interact to make meaning in ideological and creative ways, in order to critically evaluate the message of the cartoons. In line with Royce (2015), who also analysed legal cartoons following a systemic functional approach and a social-semiotic perspective, Wawra's paper puts this framework into action, taking it to the language classroom and carefully selecting a number of political cartoons that the students can easily relate to. The model developed by Wawra in a learning environment also illustrates the concept of "visually encoded and contextually loaded intersemiotic interaction" identified by Royce (2015, p. 721), and is relevant for independent and proficient users (B1 to C2 in the CEFR).…”
Section: The Contributions To This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Nichter et al (2008) has proven that creative design of cigarette advertisement can direct viewers' mind to various themes/discourse, such as masculinity, strength, friendship, enjoyment, modernity, and so forth. The effect of semiotically creative design of advertisement on people's willingness to buy advertised products either related to cigarette (Anderson et al, 2006;Ononye, 2014;Triristina, 2012) or non-cigarette (Caple, 2009;Li, 2016;Maier, 2011;Michelson & Valencia, 2016;Royce, 2015) has been empirically found. Moreover, at least one A Mild cigarette billboard found in this study was designed according to an Islamic principle regarding the fasting.…”
Section: Symbolic Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of language and linguistic, advertisements can be analyzed to examine the communicative function; hence, the meaning can be understood. Ample studies have revealed the persuasive meaning behind various advertisements, such as the one found in Coca Cola advertisement (Li, 2016), Arcadia University Website (Michelson & Valencia, 2016), advertisement through a legal cartoon (Royce, 2015), advertisement through film trailers (Maier, 2011), and advertisement of news drought in China (Caple, 2009). All of these aforementioned advertisements have one thing in common; they directly persuade viewers to choose and buy the products due to their uncontroversial nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFT was initially applied to language but has since been adapted and extended for application to the study of other semiotic resources and to multimodal texts and artefacts to account for the ways in which linguistic and non-linguistic resources combine and interact in communicating meaning (e.g. Bateman, 2014; Kress and Van Leeuwen, 2006; Martinec and Salway, 2005; O’Halloran, 2008; O’Toole, 2011; Royce, 2007, 2015; Van Leeuwen, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%