2010
DOI: 10.1080/10875540903489413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectional Perspective and Rural Poverty Research: Benefits, Challenges and Policy Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a mismatch between needs and behavior. When thinking about rurality, we must think about gender and all of the crisscrossing intersections of one's social location, including poverty, age, race, education, broadband Internet access, health literacy, and computer literacy in order to target computer health usage to rural men and women (Norris et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a mismatch between needs and behavior. When thinking about rurality, we must think about gender and all of the crisscrossing intersections of one's social location, including poverty, age, race, education, broadband Internet access, health literacy, and computer literacy in order to target computer health usage to rural men and women (Norris et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women have until recently lagged behind in technology usage, although they are at the forefront of family caretaking. Rural women have several potential crisscrossing lines of inequality, such as poverty, race and gender (Norris, Zajicek, & Murphy-Erby, 2010) and less Internet access. Understanding these intersections may help us understand the reality of how people use these technologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of knowledge about children's lives under such adverse circumstances is problematic in itself, and we fear that this 'invisibility' also delays efforts to help them and make justice for them a reality. We were also not able to do justice to the many issues discussed under the concept of intersectionality, which refers to the intersection of different forms of disadvantage, oppression and discrimination (Norris, Zajicek and Murphy-Erby 2010). Again, we find here very disturbing evidence of how modern welfare states fail children on multiple levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Instead, government agencies responsible for distinct sectors have retained power and trapped communities and regions from being responsive to new opportunities and approaches to regional development that reflects the unique context and qualities of rural regions (Healey, De Magalhaes, Madanipour, & Pendlebury, 2003). In fact, it has been suggested that historical policy approaches have reinforced path-dependency of some rural areas (Norris, Zajicek, & Murphy-Erby, 2010).…”
Section: Regional Imperativesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Future research could also explore other factors that assist regional groups to move toward effective regional approaches (Visser, 2004), as well as the types of expertise and capacities that are gained through regional processes (Hall, 2008). Broader regional approaches to address rural poverty could also be better informed by an understanding of the effectiveness and impacts of different contextual factors that shape transaction and operating costs of regional governance initiatives (Feiock, 2007;Norris et al, 2010).…”
Section: Regional Imperativesmentioning
confidence: 99%