Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice 2020
DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersecting Dimensions of Violence, Abuse, and Victimization

Abstract: Many victimization studies have focused on one dimension of violence at a time, such as looking at the effect of a specific violence type on a health outcome. But the term common best describes the occurrence of intersecting violent experiences or, more specifically, intersecting dimensions of violence, abuse, and victimization. Over time, bodies of literature about this phenomenon have morphed in terms of conceptualization and operationalization. In this context, silos have developed that place barriers withi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue becomes salient in the context of the theoretical importance of DVFRTs, as they are based on the premise that perpetrators are solely culpable for homicide and that recommendations targeted toward systems are meant to keep systems from failing victims (see e.g., Wilson & Websdale, 2006). Along the lines of perpetrator and system accountability, lack of ability to enforce recommendations may (a) mitigate the potential to treat systems, not victims (see Gondolf & Fisher, 1988) and (b) undermine the collaboration efforts that can dismantle disciplinary silos that keep actors “alone” in the broader movement to eradicate homicide (see Wilson & Websdale, 2006; for a discussion on the development of silos in anti-violence research more broadly, see Montanez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This issue becomes salient in the context of the theoretical importance of DVFRTs, as they are based on the premise that perpetrators are solely culpable for homicide and that recommendations targeted toward systems are meant to keep systems from failing victims (see e.g., Wilson & Websdale, 2006). Along the lines of perpetrator and system accountability, lack of ability to enforce recommendations may (a) mitigate the potential to treat systems, not victims (see Gondolf & Fisher, 1988) and (b) undermine the collaboration efforts that can dismantle disciplinary silos that keep actors “alone” in the broader movement to eradicate homicide (see Wilson & Websdale, 2006; for a discussion on the development of silos in anti-violence research more broadly, see Montanez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another independent variable— Poly-implementation —is a summation of the aforementioned indicators, represented by two dummy variables: one dummy variable representing one to two policies/programs in a county; and one variable representing three to four policies and programs in a county; in tandem, the reference category for this variable is a county having zero policies and programs. Application of the term poly-implementation is meant to mimic the violence-specific phenomenon of the term poly-victimization and provide future researchers with a term that can be used to name the occurrence of overlapping policy/program implementation categories (see Finkelhor et al, 2007; Montanez et al, 2020; Sabina & Straus, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations