1989
DOI: 10.2307/1241775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interruptible Water Markets in the Pacific Northwest

Abstract: This paper analyzes the potential for using a market to shift water from irrigation to hydropower use in periods of low river flow in the Snake River basin of Idaho. The water could be used for irrigation in most years but in dry years would be very valuable for firming up electric power supplies. A model of crop growth and water use was utilized to estimate farmer responses and resulting farm income losses due to market-restricted irrigation water supplies. Results indicate that estimated hydropower benefits … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrigation could still use the water in most years, but in dry periods, irrigation users would give up some water to maintain stream/river flows and power supplies. Hamilton and others believe interruptible water markets would require long-term contractual commitments, 20 to 25 years, to produce the most hydropower benefits (Hamilton, et al 1989). Hamilton and others explain that these are long-term contracts because water supplies can range from normal to only half of normal consumptive use; for farmers, market participation would be an added source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Improve Agricultural Efficiency Through Changes In Agricultumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigation could still use the water in most years, but in dry periods, irrigation users would give up some water to maintain stream/river flows and power supplies. Hamilton and others believe interruptible water markets would require long-term contractual commitments, 20 to 25 years, to produce the most hydropower benefits (Hamilton, et al 1989). Hamilton and others explain that these are long-term contracts because water supplies can range from normal to only half of normal consumptive use; for farmers, market participation would be an added source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Improve Agricultural Efficiency Through Changes In Agricultumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Option contracts are one of many ways to facilitate risk-sharing among different parties. In a key precedent to our study, Hamilton et al [1989] analyzed long-term option contracts between irrigators and hydropower companies. In this case, the option price was evaluated from the viewpoint of the irrigators, that is, the selling party.…”
Section: 脿3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamilton, Wittelsey, and Halvorsen (1989) provide an example where selling dry-period water increases the present value of water by a factor of nine. 5Alternatives must be found to compensate farmers for lost income.…”
Section: Proposed Reforms Of the Water Regime In Israel The West Banmentioning
confidence: 99%