2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrupted reading and working memory capacity.

Abstract: Long-term working memory (LT-WM; Ericsson and Kintsch, 1995) theory claims that the “transient portion of working memory is not necessary for continued comprehension” (pp. 225–226) and that “reading can be completely disrupted for over 30 s with no observable impairment of subsequent text comprehension” (p. 232). Follow-up research testing claims made by LT-WM report conflicting, indirect evidence for and against the theory. The goal for this research was to use individual differences in working memory capacit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were not consistent with our hypothesis, at least not for the accuracy of responses. In accordance with studies conducted in static settings (e.g., Drews and Musters, 2015;Foroughi et al, 2016a), WMC was associated with better baseline accuracy on our dynamic primary task. In other words, when the dots moved visibly for the entire duration of the trial, target identification became more precise as WMC increased.…”
Section: Working Memorysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results were not consistent with our hypothesis, at least not for the accuracy of responses. In accordance with studies conducted in static settings (e.g., Drews and Musters, 2015;Foroughi et al, 2016a), WMC was associated with better baseline accuracy on our dynamic primary task. In other words, when the dots moved visibly for the entire duration of the trial, target identification became more precise as WMC increased.…”
Section: Working Memorysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Working memory resources are needed not only for drawing inferences about the text, but they are also essential in the process of incorporating previous information with new incoming information, and for updating the situation model representation of the text during reading as changes in character, time, setting, and so on, occur (e.g., Zwaan & Radvansky, ). Recently, Foroughi, Barragán, and Boehm‐Davis () aimed to use individual differences in WMC to determine the plausibility of the theory that the activation of information in working memory is vital for comprehension of a given text. Participants with high or low working memory read prompts with or without interruptions.…”
Section: Text Presentation and Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important topic in this area is what role cognition has in both susceptibility to interruptions and ability to recover after interruptions occur. Attention control has been linked to resistance to interruption in work environments in a few studies (e.g., Tams et al, 2015 anda pre-registered study, Mirhoseini et al, 2020), but more research has been devoted to the role of working memory capacity (e.g., Foroughi, Barragán et al, 2016;Foroughi, Malihi et al, 2016;Foroughi, Werner et al, 2016;Gillie & Broadbent, 1989;Westbrook et al, 2018). These studies found support for the idea that working memory capacity has a protective effect against interruptions.…”
Section: Complex Task Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies found support for the idea that working memory capacity has a protective effect against interruptions. For example Foroughi, Barragán et al (2016) found that working memory capacity accounted for about 12% of the variance in errors in manual data entry following an interruption. While the short-term storage of information may be an important aspect of task resumption, it is more likely that the management of attention and place keeping would play a crucial role and explain more variance in performance following interruptions.…”
Section: Complex Task Performancementioning
confidence: 99%