Interrow spacing and sugarcane yield in a diversity of climates: A major review

Abstract

The reduction of sugarcane interrow spacing has the potential to increase crop yield, but research results concerning sugarcane cultivation in Brazil and worldwide remain inconclusive. Therefore, the objective of this review was to evaluate the influence of interrow spacing on the stalk fresh yield (SFY) of sugarcane and to identify the most appropriate interrow spacing in different climates and water regimes (irrigated or rainfed). In this study, a broad review of published studies was conducted to gather experimental data and evaluate the influence of interrow spacing on sugarcane SFY. A total of 28 relevant studies was used, including 170 field experiments in nine countries. Field experimental data were grouped on the basis of similarity of climate, using hierarchical cluster analysis for rainfed and irrigated experiments. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate whether there was a variation between the SFY values, and Tukey tests were applied to compare the SFY means for each interrow spacing. The results indicated that SFY significantly increased as interrow spacing was reduced. Interrow spacing of 90 cm had the greatest SFY (p < .01) for both irrigated and rainfed treatments. The lowest average SFY values were among spacings from 150 to 180 cm, which are most frequently used in the largest-producing countries, depending on the climate zone and water regime. Despite the increase in yield, the use of narrower interrow spacing is limited mainly due to the soil compaction and sugarcane stool damage caused by the currently used tillage and harvesting machines.

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of SAMUCA crop model across contrasting environments in Brazil

“…The Brazilian sugarcane industry is in constant development, testing and releasing new cultivars and management practices to increase the yield. It is consensus that environment and genotypes control the sugarcane yield level (Leal et al, 2013; and interacts with farming practices (Soares and Marin, 2021), interrow spacing (Gasparotto et al, 2020) and crop water responses . Process-based crop models (PBCM) are able to assess cultivars performances in terms of yield (Inman-Bamber et al, 2012;, the effect of green cane trash blanket (GCTB), interrow spacing and soil processes on crop growth , and irrigation strategies across distinct environments.…”