2012
DOI: 10.1080/10573569.2013.741953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrogating Instruction and Intervention in RTI Research With Students Identified as English Language Learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This team, the Behavior Intervention Team (BIT), meets together once a week to discuss the 'best' strategies to reach the student and engage the family within the student's learning. Specific to ELLs, some of these strategies may include Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) (Kareva & Echevarria, 2013;Daniel & Conlin, 2015) or even Response To Intervention (RTI) (Thorius & Sullivan, 2012;Castro-Villarreal, Rodriguez, & Moore, 2014).…”
Section: Deficit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This team, the Behavior Intervention Team (BIT), meets together once a week to discuss the 'best' strategies to reach the student and engage the family within the student's learning. Specific to ELLs, some of these strategies may include Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) (Kareva & Echevarria, 2013;Daniel & Conlin, 2015) or even Response To Intervention (RTI) (Thorius & Sullivan, 2012;Castro-Villarreal, Rodriguez, & Moore, 2014).…”
Section: Deficit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sole effect of the phonological components was not investigated in these studies. Furthermore, Thorius and Sullivan (2013) synthesized studies with ELL students in the Response to Intervention setting and found that most of the studies were conducted at Tier 2 level, where the instruction is targeted at struggling readers and is delivered relatively intensively and in small group. In contrast, studies investigating the instructional effects in general educational setting are scarce.…”
Section: Phonological-based Instruction In the Efl Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some English teachers took phonics instruction as an easy way out, because they were not confident in conversing in English themselves (Zhou and Mcgride-Chang, 2009). research reviews with english-language learners (ell) in english-Dominant societies Several literature reviews have been conducted on the topic of effectiveness of phonological-based instruction with the ELL, who learn English as their second language in English-dominant societies (Thorius and Sullivan, 2013;Stephens, 2014;RichardsTutor et al, 2015). National reading panel reported that ELL students generally respond to phonological-based instruction as well as English-native-speaking students (August et al, 2009).…”
Section: Phonological-based Instruction In the Efl Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, 86 % of African American and 82 % of Hispanic/Latino eighth graders read below grade level compared to 59 % White eighth graders, with similar percentages for math (U.S. DOE 2012). Furthermore, African Americans/Blacks are overrepresented in special education programs nationally, while ELLs are increasingly overrepresented in southwestern states Thorius and Sullivan 2013). Only 56 % of students receiving special education services complete high school with a regular diploma, while approximately 26 % drop out (U.S. DOE 2011).…”
Section: School-age Population and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%