Interprofessional learning enhances knowledge of roles but is less able to shift attitudes: a case study from dental education

Abstract

Introduction: Interprofessional education (IPE) purports to improve team working through improved knowledge of the roles of others, and by engendering mutual respect. This case study aimed to determine the impact of an IPE curriculum on knowledge and attitudes of dentistry and dental technology students undertaking these curricula in the new School of Dentistry and Oral Health at Griffith University. All dental technology students and third‐ and final‐ (fifth) year dentistry students were invited to participate. Method: A mixed‐method approach was used to compare attitudes, perceptions and experiences of students involved in our IPE curricula. Quantitative data were evaluated with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), and qualitative findings were explored through an Excel® spreadsheet coding frame tested against LeximancerTM qualitative software for consistency. Results: Forty‐six of the 131 eligible students participated. Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scales (RIPLS) and focus groups consistently showed that IPE positively influenced professional identity and improved communication between and amongst all students and assisted them in developing their roles. A prevailing sense of greater importance and a lack of mutual respect between dentistry and dental technology students were, unfortunately, evident. The process was, however, sufficient to enhance teamwork and collaboration when planned learning revolved around explicit patient care in the provision of dental prostheses. Conclusion: Further development of such curricula is needed to maximise IP learning (IPL) opportunities, to shift traditional attitudes and, potentially, to improve the outcomes of patient care. To enable this, academic and clinical leaders need to embrace the ideals of IPE.

Cognitive-Processing Bias in Chinese Student Teachers with Strong and Weak Professional Identity

“…In addition, professional self-schemas could have been a contributory factor in this bias. Professional self-schemas are formed during learning via the observation of qualified teachers (Lamote and Engels, 2010). In addition, they undergo qualitative changes resulting from profession-related life events, which could lead to the development of cognitive-processing biases that are consistent with self-schemas (Kou and Zhang, 2013).…”

A critical appraisal of instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education

“…The IEPS and RIPLS are the instruments most frequently utilised by researchers in the field of IPE and collaborative practice. The IEPS and RIPLS have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of IPE interventions such as interprofessional curricula, IPE projects, interprofessional clinical or fieldwork placements, and online IPE learning modules . Although both instruments have been popular choices for researchers and educators alike, their use in measuring between‐group differences or within‐group change resulting from IPE interventions is problematic.…”

A Unique Interprofessional and Multi-Institutional Education Series

“…The shape of the health care workforce is moving toward more collaborative models of patient care. Mutual respect and understanding of roles and responsibilities are essential for effective collaborating and teamwork, with hopes of improved quality care (Evans, Henderson, & Johnson, 2012).…”