2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting the Lactulose Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea or constipation all patients initially underwent the lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT), using a breath hydrogen analyzer (Gastrolyzer, Bedfont Scientific Ltd, UK). The test result was considered positive (confirming SIBO) when an increase in the concentration of hydrogen in the expired air was above 20 ppm (percent per million) within 60 min of ingesting 25 ml of lactulose in accordance with generally accepted criteria [ 23 ]. Then, in LHBT-positive patients a breath test was performed using 75 mg of 13 C-labeled urea and a FAN-ci 2 device set (Fisher ANalysen Instrumente GmbH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea or constipation all patients initially underwent the lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT), using a breath hydrogen analyzer (Gastrolyzer, Bedfont Scientific Ltd, UK). The test result was considered positive (confirming SIBO) when an increase in the concentration of hydrogen in the expired air was above 20 ppm (percent per million) within 60 min of ingesting 25 ml of lactulose in accordance with generally accepted criteria [ 23 ]. Then, in LHBT-positive patients a breath test was performed using 75 mg of 13 C-labeled urea and a FAN-ci 2 device set (Fisher ANalysen Instrumente GmbH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a range of criteria exists for time of determination, including 90-120 minutes 15 , the recommendation of a cut-off of 60-80 min by Sunny et al 16 and 60 min by Eisenmann et al 3 may improve specificity of the lactulose challenge. Current guidelines 8,15 state a peak that occurs before 90 min (assuming normal bowel transit time) is suggestive of a bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current guidelines 8,15 state a peak that occurs before 90 min (assuming normal bowel transit time) is suggestive of a bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine. The requirement of a further increase of at least 15 ppm hydrogen gas within 180 min as confirmation of colonic fermentation of lactulose has also been specified 16 but this is not widely reported. Rapid oro-cecal transit has been demonstrated after test substrate ingestion 31,32 , yet slower small bowel transit has been demonstrated in the presence of methane 33 -a gas of particular interest in our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a range of criteria exists for time of determination, including 90-120 minutes 15 , the recommendation of a cut-off of 60-80 min by Sunny et al 16 and 60 min by Eisenmann et al 3 may improve specificity of the lactulose challenge. Current guidelines 8,15 state a peak that occurs before 90 min (assuming normal bowel transit time) is suggestive of a bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current guidelines 8,15 state a peak that occurs before 90 min (assuming normal bowel transit time) is suggestive of a bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine. The requirement of a further increase of at least 15 ppm hydrogen gas within 180 min as confirmation of colonic fermentation of lactulose has also been specified 16 but this is not widely reported. Rapid oro-cecal transit has been demonstrated after test substrate ingestion 31,32 , yet slower small bowel transit has been demonstrated in the presence of methane 33 -a gas of particular interest in our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%