1992
DOI: 10.1086/298286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting Panel Data on Job Tenure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Job tenure data are often considered crude and relatively less reliable. Among the many problems associated with job tenure data in the literature are: inconsistency of reporting across calendar years, recall and rounding errors, spikes in the tenure distributions at years which are multiples of …ve (see Brown and Light, 1992). The relative separation rates that we estimate do seem to be very similar with those in Jolivet, Postel-Vinay, and Robin (2006) as well as those in OECD (1997).…”
Section: Panel Survey (Echp) For the European Countries And Panel Stusupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Job tenure data are often considered crude and relatively less reliable. Among the many problems associated with job tenure data in the literature are: inconsistency of reporting across calendar years, recall and rounding errors, spikes in the tenure distributions at years which are multiples of …ve (see Brown and Light, 1992). The relative separation rates that we estimate do seem to be very similar with those in Jolivet, Postel-Vinay, and Robin (2006) as well as those in OECD (1997).…”
Section: Panel Survey (Echp) For the European Countries And Panel Stusupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Recent papers by Altonji and Williams (1992), Brown (1989), Brown and Light (1992), Farber (1995), Hutchens (1989), Ruhm (1990), and Topel (1991) demonstrate that there are no final answers on this issue. Here we have been able to include information on mobile and immobile workers with the finding that there is not much evidence for firm-specific tenure effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 As documented in Brown and Light (1992), there are numerous inconsistencies in the PSID in reported tenure values. For example, an individual may report 3, 4.5, and 2 years of tenure in three consecutive years.…”
Section: B Earnings Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, in assigning individual observations to jobs, we assumed that a job is being seen the first time whenever reported tenure is less than the elapsed time since the previous interview. This corresponds to "partition T" in Brown and Light (1992) and Parent (2000). In the above example, this rule tells us that the individual changed his/her job after the second year, i.e, we re-assigned the tenure values to 3, 4 and 1.…”
Section: B Earnings Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%