Interpreting mood choice effects in L2 and L1 Spanish: empirical evidence and theoretical implications

Abstract

The rich morphology of Spanish, such as that of tense and verbal mood, encodes a range of features leading to diverse contextual effects on interpretation, some of which are examined in the light of original experimental data in the present study. Specifically, we analyse data on the interpretation of mood in concessive structures by upper-intermediate and advanced learners of L2 Spanish, with L1 French (N=48) and L1 English (N=40), and from an L1 European Spanish control group (N=35). The results of the learner-group interpretation experiment led to a follow-on study enquiring into the understanding of mood alternation in concessive clauses by another group of L1 European Spanish speakers through a metalinguistic interpretation task. Learner group findings suggested a heavier reliance on lexical information and world-knowledge than on grammatical cues, while L1 speakers’ data indicate a default association maintained between subjunctive and irrealis interpretations, leading to a greater measure of variability in describing presuppositional uses of this mood. The native speaker data may reflect challenges posed by representing and describing, using metalinguistic knowledge, structures whose interpretation requires the integration of linguistic, discourse and extralinguistic information. Findings are discussed in relation to current linguistic descriptions and potential contributions of our empirical data.

Heritage Speakers as Part of the Native Language Continuum

“…This can be due to simple causes, such as the possibility to name all vs. just some of the agents or circumstances in the respective narratives, or recurrence and repetition of previously named entities vs. ellipsis. At the same time, a more or less frequent realization of elements may also be indicative of differences in communicative style (explicitness, emphasis) or formality (assumption of interlocutor expectations; see also Ahern et al, 2019 : 487, 488). This can, for example, affect the frequency of modifying structures such as adverbs or relative clauses, which can be used to specify or comment on another dependency.…”