1997
DOI: 10.1520/jfs14100j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting DNA Mixtures

Abstract: The interpretation of mixed DNA stains is explained in the context of likelihood ratios. The probabilities for the mixedstain profile are evaluated under alternative explanations that specify the numbers of contributors and the profiles of any known contributors. Interpretations based simply on the frequencies with which random members of a population would not be excluded from a mixed-stain profile do not make use of all the information, and may overstate the strength of the evidence against included people. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic analysis and interpretation of this kind of criminal evidence is assisted by statistical analysis using the LR (Weir et al, 1997;Hu et al, 2003;González-Andrade et al, 2006;Primorac and Schanfield, 2014), which is the probability of association between possible trace samples (human blood found in the digestive tract of mosquitoes) and references samples. González-Andrade et al (2006), who reviewed cases of sex offenders and the resulting mixture genetic profiles, the calculation result of LR was one million, whereas the analysis of human blood hematophagous mosquitoes found in the lowest rate was LR approximately eight quintillion on a population; discriminating enough the association between the possible trace and reference samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic analysis and interpretation of this kind of criminal evidence is assisted by statistical analysis using the LR (Weir et al, 1997;Hu et al, 2003;González-Andrade et al, 2006;Primorac and Schanfield, 2014), which is the probability of association between possible trace samples (human blood found in the digestive tract of mosquitoes) and references samples. González-Andrade et al (2006), who reviewed cases of sex offenders and the resulting mixture genetic profiles, the calculation result of LR was one million, whereas the analysis of human blood hematophagous mosquitoes found in the lowest rate was LR approximately eight quintillion on a population; discriminating enough the association between the possible trace and reference samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calculation of the likelihood ratio (lR) or Bayesian factor was used for representativeness of the established evidence sample (33). the likelihood ratio is explicit evidence for the probability to determine a given DNA profile if the cell material has been left by another person apart from suspect one or the perpetrator (9,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the NRC-I (1992) demonstrated the evaluation of a simple mixture problem, but the calculation was incorrect. Recently, Weir et al (1997) obtained a general formula, based on the generalization of results developed for simple cases, for the match probabilities in the mixture. The above work has been referred to for a fuller evaluation of mixed samples by the NRC-II (1996).…”
Section: Dna Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above work has been referred to for a fuller evaluation of mixed samples by the NRC-II (1996). Evett et al (1991) and Weir et al (1997) employed the product rule in the mixed sample problem which required the assumption of HW equilibrium. As mentioned earlier, the HW law is seldom exactly certain or correct.…”
Section: Dna Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%