2010
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting complex, three‐dimensional, near‐surface GPR surveys: an integrated modelling and inversion approach

Abstract: With the increasing computational power of modern personal computers, sophisticated modelling and inversion techniques are becoming popular tools for the interpretation of high‐resolution, fully three‐dimensional GPR surveys. In this paper, we present the latest results of ongoing practical research into the development of novel, integrated, finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) numerical modelling and linear tomographic inversion methods for the interpretation and analysis of near–surface, 3D GPR data. The pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, FDTD modeling is highly recommended when the interpretation of GPR data is not clear. Other authors have probed how the use of numerical FDTD modeling becomes an effective tool for improving the analysis and interpretation of GPR data [29]. In this study, more realistic synthetic models were constructed with the accurate geometric data obtained with photogrammetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, FDTD modeling is highly recommended when the interpretation of GPR data is not clear. Other authors have probed how the use of numerical FDTD modeling becomes an effective tool for improving the analysis and interpretation of GPR data [29]. In this study, more realistic synthetic models were constructed with the accurate geometric data obtained with photogrammetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For synthetic plastic (PVC) and bone materials, parameters were assumed from the literature ( [28] and [29], respectively). In the case of a sandy-clay medium (backfill 1), relative permittivity was estimated using the radar wave velocity calculated, and the conductivity was set according to the soil analysis provided.…”
Section: Fdtd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical methods of analysis of near-surface radar data generally rely on the visual inspection and interpretation of reflection profiles (e.g., 1 ) and sometimes on the inverse modelling of the acquired data (e.g., 2 ). These methods have been successfully applied in several fields, from archaeological research to civil engineering, to detect relatively large structures buried at shallow depth, but suffer from severe limitations when the target has a thickness below the Ricker or Rayleigh estimates of the GPR antenna vertical resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have proposed many imaging techniques, such as full‐waveform inversion, tomography and migration imaging to map the detected target (Fletcher et al ., 2009; Lavoué et al ., 2014; Bradford, 2015; Salcedo et al ., 2020). For large and complex karst caves, however, those GPR imaging techniques are still limited to theoretical analysis and difficult to be used in engineering practice (Millington et al ., 2011). Due to the space limitation in tunnels, it is difficult to obtain a complete reflection signal for the detected target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%