1995
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(95)71143-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same group in another comparison study concluded, "For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, 2D TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for x-ray angiography." 135 Other centers have demonstrated better success using similar techniques. Carpenter et al 135a performed a 2D TOF MRA and CA study in 47 patients and formulated separate interventional plans for each modality.…”
Section: Peripheral Mramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same group in another comparison study concluded, "For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, 2D TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for x-ray angiography." 135 Other centers have demonstrated better success using similar techniques. Carpenter et al 135a performed a 2D TOF MRA and CA study in 47 patients and formulated separate interventional plans for each modality.…”
Section: Peripheral Mramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSNA, 2008 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi /content/full/2491071706/DC1 C ontrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is an imaging technique with a multitude of clinical applications (1)(2)(3)(4). Currently, contrast-enhanced MR angiographic techniques are most commonly based on T1 shortening of blood caused by MR angiographic contrast agents (5,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study evaluated 2D PC MRA, 66 11 evaluated 2D TOF MRA, 22,27,29,32,40,41,53,55,64,69,74 and 14 evaluated CE MRA. 9,28,36,46,49,51,53,61,65,67,68,70,73,76 There were no studies providing results for the assessment of 3D TOF MRA.…”
Section: Mramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 11 studies evaluating 2D TOF MRA 22,27,29,32,40,41,53,55,64,69,74 provided a total of 22 data sets. The results are reported by the anatomy assessed and the full set of diagnostic accuracy results is presented in Table 5.…”
Section: D Tof Mramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation