1975
DOI: 10.1080/00018737500101511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation ofS-state ion E.P.R. spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
217
2
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
11
217
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also do not expect significant changes of the parameters U (4) , b 4 (κt) and X (κt)4 because these two ions are very similar. The inadequacy of a model in which the RE ion interacts with the enviroment by electrostatic crystal field potential only has been already noticed in the literature 5,8,9 . In 1978 Barnes et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also do not expect significant changes of the parameters U (4) , b 4 (κt) and X (κt)4 because these two ions are very similar. The inadequacy of a model in which the RE ion interacts with the enviroment by electrostatic crystal field potential only has been already noticed in the literature 5,8,9 . In 1978 Barnes et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual Stevens operators [1,2] in EMR studies [27,28] and to a lesser extend in the crystal field theory and superposition model analysis [29,30,31]. Group theory predicts that for lower symmetry cases the negative q components are required [2,3,4].…”
Section: Basic Nomenclature and Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation of the axis systems assigned to experimentally determined ZFSP sets may be possible by comparison with model calculations using, e.g. superposition model analysis [29][30][31], which must be carried out in a well-defined axis system, usually the crystallographic one.…”
Section: Basic Nomenclature and Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the SM was introduced by Newman and his co-workers 7,9 to successfully analyse the CFP of lanthanide ions in various garnets and other crystal systems 10 , its equation and formalism had been widely extended to model the spin-Hamiltonian parameters (SHP) for the zero-field splittings of the ground 8 S 7/2 state of the 4f 7 (Gd 3+ and Eu 2+ ) ions or ground 6 S 5/2 state of 3d 5 (Fe 3+ and Mn 2+ ) ions [11][12][13] , even though the contributing mechanisms to SHP are substantially different from those of CFP. For analyzing the crystal field splittings of the 3d transition-metal ions, the examples of SM application were relatively fewer [14][15][16] because of the rather limited number or incomplete set of CFP derived from some experimental energy levels of which their states are often poorly determined or identified.…”
Section: Superposition Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%