2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative zero-field splitting (ZFS) parameter sets and standardization for Mn2+ ions in various hosts exhibiting orthorhombic site symmetry

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standardization of orthorhombic and monoclinic ZFS (as well as crystal fi eld) parameters [23,24] will be considered in a full paper. Preliminary results for the impurity Cr 3+ and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardization of orthorhombic and monoclinic ZFS (as well as crystal fi eld) parameters [23,24] will be considered in a full paper. Preliminary results for the impurity Cr 3+ and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above approximations may have a little affect on the fitted value of a [12,13]. The direction of the maximum overall splitting of EPR spectra is taken as the z axis and the minimum as the x axis [14]. The laboratory axes (x, y, z) are parallel to the crystallographic axes (CA) (a, b, c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(33) and (34), and CT energies E n1 ( E39700 cm À 1 ) and E n2 ( E47800 cm À 1 ) [2,3], a best matching to the experimental EPR parameters [4] is made and yields DR c ¼ 0:0091 nm, DR p ¼ 0:0002 nm ð36Þ Fig. 4.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To make a direct comparison, a transformation is needed. Using the relation tables [33,34], Table 2 The EPR parameters D and E (in units of cm À 1 ) for the rhombic Ni 2 þ centers in LiCl:Ni 2 þ crystals. Table A3 A2 Â T1 G T 2…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%