2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-smt.2014.0197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of adjoint sensitivity analysis for shape optimal design of electromagnetic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, no numerical noise due remeshing is observed as opposed to finite-difference. We implemented a 2D FEM code and an AVM code based on the discrete approach [12] for the gradient computation. The implementation of the AVM code is cumbersome since it requires intrusive manipulation of the FEM code itself.…”
Section: Adjoint Variable Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, no numerical noise due remeshing is observed as opposed to finite-difference. We implemented a 2D FEM code and an AVM code based on the discrete approach [12] for the gradient computation. The implementation of the AVM code is cumbersome since it requires intrusive manipulation of the FEM code itself.…”
Section: Adjoint Variable Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjoint variable is inserted in (7), which is responsible for the connect the design variables of the problem (x, y) and the objective function [20], [30]:…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle all these issues, some researchers have proposed to use the adjoint variable method for computing the gradient from the mathematical model of the electromagnetic phenomena [6,7,19]. This approach requires an intrusive manipulation of the FE code to calculate the gradient efficiently and accurately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%