2021
DOI: 10.1177/14759217211044806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretable convolutional sparse coding method of Lamb waves for damage identification and localization

Abstract: Lamb wave-based damage identification and localization methods hold the potential for nondestructive evaluation and structural health monitoring. Dispersive and multimodal characteristics lead to complicated Lamb wave signals that are challenging to be analyzed. Deep learning architectures could identify damage-related features effectively. Convolutional neural network (CNN) is a promising architecture that has been widely applied in recent years. However, this data-driven approach still lacks a certain degree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work, an interpretable Lamb wave convolutional sparse coding (LW-CSC) method was adopted for structural damage identification and localization. 25 The damage features are extracted according to multi-layer ISTA. Additionally, as mentioned before, the case of 0 unfoldings corresponds to the standard CNN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous work, an interpretable Lamb wave convolutional sparse coding (LW-CSC) method was adopted for structural damage identification and localization. 25 The damage features are extracted according to multi-layer ISTA. Additionally, as mentioned before, the case of 0 unfoldings corresponds to the standard CNN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, sparse coding-based approaches have been widely utilized for Lamb wave damage localization. [23][24][25] Since the structure is mostly damage-free in normal circumstances, the recorded signals can be expressed with several nonzero coefficients containing effective damage information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the robustness of the network, data augmentation was employed by adding randomly distributed Gaussian noise to the images. 20 A hundred images per damage scenario were created, resulting in a total of 320 and 160 images for the rectangular and circular arrays, respectively, for each panel. The final size of the dataset is therefore 480 images of 7 × 10,568 pixels.…”
Section: Dataset Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [14] proposed a method combining deep convolutional neural network and continuous wavelet transform to achieve the detection of internal damage of CFRP, the damaged Lamb wave signals were obtained by arranging piezoelectric (PZT) sensor network, and the Lamb wave signals were processed by the proposed method to realize the fatigue damage diagnosis. Zhang et al [15] proposed an interpretable Lamb wave convolutional sparse coding (LW-CSC) method for structural damage identification and localization, and the experimental results demonstrated that the method could improve classification accuracy, and achieve damage localization accurately. Gao and Hua [16] proposed a deep learning algorithm combining convolutional neural networks (CNN) with stacked autoencoders (SAE) and processed the broadband Lamb wave signals for material damage localization and quantification, and the effectiveness of the method through experiments was verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%