2023
DOI: 10.1177/14759217231189972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Lamb wave-based damage diagnosis in composite materials using a pseudo-damage boosted convolutional neural network approach

Alvaro Gonzalez-Jimenez,
Luca Lomazzi,
Rafael Junges
et al.

Abstract: Damage diagnosis of thin-walled structures has been successfully performed through methods based on tomography and machine learning-driven methods. According to traditional approaches, diagnostic signals are excited and sensed on the structure through a permanently installed network of sensors and are processed to obtain information about the damage. Good performance characterizes methods that process Lamb waves, which are described by long propagation distances and high sensitivity to anomalies. Most of the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, refs. [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] aimed to overcome challenges associated with information loss during feature extraction, biases in feature selection, limitations in composite material considerations, and the need for large high-fidelity datasets, using for instance, a combination of unsupervised data-driven methods with tomographic approaches without the need for extensive training datasets. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge that changes to the waves are not exclusively indicative of structural alterations within the monitored system but may also be influenced by various environmental and operational conditions (EOCs), such as moisture, vibration, and especially temperature, as exhibited in [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, refs. [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] aimed to overcome challenges associated with information loss during feature extraction, biases in feature selection, limitations in composite material considerations, and the need for large high-fidelity datasets, using for instance, a combination of unsupervised data-driven methods with tomographic approaches without the need for extensive training datasets. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge that changes to the waves are not exclusively indicative of structural alterations within the monitored system but may also be influenced by various environmental and operational conditions (EOCs), such as moisture, vibration, and especially temperature, as exhibited in [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%