Interpositional bone‐grafting of the atrophic edentulous mandible. A review

Moloney, Frank; Tideman, H.; Stoelinga, Paul J.W.; Koomen, Hans A. de

doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1985.tb04137.x

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two articles were identified reporting on tent‐pole grafting and 1 using a tunnel flap procedure, all using a submental approach …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In their study, they did not investigate the differences between the different surgical bone augmentation modalities. The most challenging issue in these treatment modalities is the unpredictable resorption of the bone graft, sometimes up to 50 per cent, already described in 1985 for several surgical techniques by Moloney et al . To our knowledge, there has not been a review that included articles on pre‐implant bone augmentation procedures in patients with fully edentulous, severely atrophic mandibles only.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bone augmentation followed by implant surgery in the edentulous mandible: A systematic review

Groot

Oomens

Forouzanfar

et al. 2018

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Long-standing loss of natural teeth in the mandible can lead to severe jaw atrophy and even mandibular fracture. There is no consensus on the best pre-prosthetic surgical treatment to reconstruct the atrophic edentulous mandible. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the existing literature and to give an evidence-based recommendation for bone grafting and future research. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. A literature search was performed in online databases Pubmed and Cochrane library for articles published between January 1980 and September 2017. The search was conducted using Medical Subject Heading terms: alveolar ridge augmentation; mouth, edentulous and mandible. Eligible articles were included according to in- and exclusion criteria and assessed on quality. Dental implant survival and bone stability were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were complications. Twenty-four text articles matched the criteria and were included. Eleven articles were assessed to be of adequate quality for analysis. Graft stability seems to be higher in vertical distraction and tent-pole grafting, but as the dental implant survival is high (91.7% or higher) regardless of the procedure used for bone augmentation, this is of no clinical relevance. The survival rate of dental implants is high, regardless of the bone augmentation procedure used. High-quality clinical trials are needed to support the current evidence and guidelines on pre-implant bone grafting. Reporting of future research should include proper baseline characteristics and treatment description, as well as uniform outcome rendering.

show abstract

“…Two articles were identified reporting on tent‐pole grafting and 1 using a tunnel flap procedure, all using a submental approach …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone augmentation followed by implant surgery in the edentulous mandible: A systematic review

Groot

Oomens

Forouzanfar

et al. 2018

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These findings are in agreement with the results of previous investigations in which hydroxyapatite and collagen membranes were used for ridge augmentation procedures (Periklis Proussaefs 2003, Frank Peter Strietzel 1986, Frame JW 1987, Jae Eun Chung 2008). [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] CONCLUSION Careful diagnosis and surgical-prosthetic treatment planning with joint consultation prior to surgery should be performed in order to attain optimal esthetic results. Various techniques exist for correction of a deformed ridge.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[19] • Ridge expansion techniques. [20][21][22] • Alveolar distraction osteogenesis. [23,24] CASE REPORTS…”

Section: Donor Site (Hard Palate) [Figures 1d and E]mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre prosthetic reconstruction of alveolar ridge

Lakshmaiahenkatesh¹,

Suryaprakash²,

Varadan³

et al. 2011

J Int Clin Dent Res Organ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…After the teeth were lost, the alveolar ridge undergoes a continuous resorptive process that is severely accelerated by denture wear 10 . This process is the most pronounced during the first 12 months after the tooth extractions 11,12 . Excessive resorption of the alveolar ridge in a vertical direction may compromise possibility of implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%