Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 192.122.237.41 on Wed, 12 Aug 2015 01:08:13 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions five new ones. They label and briefly discuss them as follows: exchange theory (they are unsure of what to call it), general systems theory, conflict theory, social individualism, and transactional analysis. (For one account of recent developments in family theory and conceptual frameworks which differs in important ways, see Holman and Burr, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980.) Such assessments of trends are liable to evoke interesting controversies, but my concern here lies elsewhere. Four of the five percolating frameworks which the editors introduce (sans exchange theory, for which Nye himself has been a major proselytizer) have been thoughtfully examined, they tell us, in unpublished papers (Cornille and Harrington, Cotton and Oransky, Farrington and Foss, Richards). Furthermore, three of these were prepared by graduate students at Florida State University, where the original book took shape. In my judgment, it would have been valuable to include these four papers and one on exchange theory as new chapters in the book, with revisions to make them conform to the format of the other chapters and with the outside editorial consultation used as before. As it is, we are only tantalized with a few assumptions or propositions from these other works. I do appreciate, however, why the editors may have elected not to follow this daring course. It would have made more obvious the obsolescence of the untouched original chapters.In sum, my advice is that if you are one of the fortunate ones to have a copy of the original book, don't bother to buy this one. The rest of us will find the reissue valuable like an heirloom, a statement of where family theory was in the middle of the 1960s. The book remains very useful for graduate training, but, more than ever before, it needs to be supplemented with accessible materials written more recently.

Fostering Attachment Security: The Role of Interdependent Situations

“…For example, while it may be very easy to behave in a trustworthy manner in situations of corresponding interests, it may be way more challenging to do so in situations of conflict of interests [ 27 , 33 ]. Interdependence theory [ 13 , 25 ] provides the ideal framework to investigate how the properties of social situations that partners experience shape relationship dynamics and dispositions. The present work also contributes to the literature on interdependence by revealing how certain individuals may react differently to the social situations that they experience.…”

“…Specifically, research has focused on what insecure individuals can do to foster a sense of attachment security [ 10 ] and how a relationship partner can help them in this process [ 9 , 11 ]. However, besides the role of the two interacting partners, as Social Psychology [ 12 ] and Interdependence Theory [ 13 ] emphasize, the features of the situations that people encounter with others can also play a major role in shaping people’s emotions, cognition, and behaviors. In this work, we adopt an Interdependence Theory framework to investigate how the features of the situations experienced in daily life with one’s romantic partner (i.e., correspondence of interests, information certainty, power, mutual dependence, and future interdependence; see Table 1 for definitions) are related to relationship outcomes for anxiously and avoidantly attached individuals, and how these situations can boost or undermine feelings of security toward one’s current partner.…”

Examining theories, mediators and moderators in financial well-being literature: a systematic review and future research agenda

“…Yeo and Lee (2019) employed social capital theory (Lin, 2001) to show that larger economic resources complemented with greater levels of social resources and emotional support at the community level contribute to higher levels of individual life satisfaction. Based on the theory of the interdependence of preferences (Hansen et al, 1982) which suggests that an individual's level of utility is influenced by the circumstances of a comparison group, Brown and Gray (2016) reported that the financial position of comparison groups is an important determinant of one's life satisfaction and financial well-being. Combined with the theory of planned behavior, Braun Santos et al (2016) developed a theoretical model based on social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954) which suggests that people evaluate themselves through comparison with other others.…”

Learning Roles with Emergent Social Value Orientations

“…Considering the completeness of the theory and the feasibility of convergence analysis, this paper mainly focuses on solving intertemporal or public good social dilemmas based on social value orientations. The aforementioned mainstream conclusions about SVO from social psychology and economics are mainly supported by interdependence theory (Hansen, 1982). In social psychology and economics games, classical game theory does not accurately predict human behavior.…”

“…In social psychology and economics games, classical game theory does not accurately predict human behavior. This is because, in these human-involved games, each player does not rely on the given payoff matrix to make decisions but on their own "effective" payoff matrix (Hansen, 1982;McKee et al, 2020). The effective payoff matrix is constructed by redistributing payoffs for the given payoff matrix based on the players' respective SVOs.…”