2017
DOI: 10.1037/abn0000235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal callousness and co-occurring anxiety: Developmental validity of an adolescent taxonomy.

Abstract: Growing evidence suggests heterogeneity within interpersonal-callous (IC) youth based on co-occurring anxiety. The developmental validity of this proposed taxonomy remains unclear however, as most previous research is cross-sectional and/or limited to adolescence. We aimed to identify low-anxiety (IC/ANX−) and high-anxiety (IC/ANX+) IC variants, and compare these groups on (a) early risk exposures, (b) psychiatric symptoms from mid-childhood to early adolescence, and (c) school-based functioning. Using the Avo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, high-IC youth have been shown to perform worse on [+] = increasing; [−] = decreasing; CIs = confidence intervals; P M = ratio of indirect effect to total effect. a P M is >1 due to opposite signs for the direct and indirect effect; this specific indirect effect represented 43.6% of the total indirect effect from IC/LPB to physical health problems national standardized tests (Meehan et al 2017). Academic failure, an established NEET risk factor, could therefore offer an indirect pathway from IC/LPB to NEET status by restricting later opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, high-IC youth have been shown to perform worse on [+] = increasing; [−] = decreasing; CIs = confidence intervals; P M = ratio of indirect effect to total effect. a P M is >1 due to opposite signs for the direct and indirect effect; this specific indirect effect represented 43.6% of the total indirect effect from IC/LPB to physical health problems national standardized tests (Meehan et al 2017). Academic failure, an established NEET risk factor, could therefore offer an indirect pathway from IC/LPB to NEET status by restricting later opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, childhood studies consistently report a moderate association between higher levels of psychopathic traits Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09756-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. and lower levels of prosocial behavior (e.g., caring, comforting, or volunteering behaviors; see Eisenberg et al 2006), with these youth characterized by higher levels of early risk exposure and co-occurring externalizing and internalizing problems (Barker et al 2011;Meehan et al 2017). In an exploratory factor analysis of childhood behavioral measures, Dadds et al (2005) identified a single factor comprised of 'Callous-Unemotional' (i.e., PCL Factor 1) items from the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD; Frick and Hare 2001;e.g., 'no guilt', 'does not show feelings or emotions', 'breaks promises') and reverse-coded 'prosocial' items from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman 1997; e.g., 'unhelpful if someone is hurt, upset, or ill', 'not kind to younger children').…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, studies have primarily identified variants of CU youth using state-of-the-art clustering approaches, which are hypothesis-free and person-centred [6, 7, 1418, 2628, 3032]. Together, these reports have been invaluable in demonstrating that individuals naturally cluster into groups based on their on levels of CU and anxiety—providing strong, data-driven evidence validating the existence of two variants of CU youth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the three dimensions of psychopathy and anxiety combined yield different variants in male juvenile offenders (Kimonis et al, 2012), and the current study can give more insight in whether the variants are already visible in youth from the general population. Different from other studies that focused only on callous-unemotional traits among youth (e.g., Gill & Stickle, 2016;Meehan et al, 2016), the current study takes into account all three dimensions of psychopathy. By doing so, intervention efforts can be more specifically focused based on the needs of youth differentiated on the three psychopathy dimensions (i.e., interpersonal, affective, and lifestyle dimensions) in combination with different levels of anxiety.…”
Section: Current Study and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though both primary and secondary variants have been found in males and females (Falkenbach et al, 2017;Hicks et al, 2004), studies suggest that males are overrepresented in the primary group, whereas females are overrepresented the secondary psychopathy group (Falkenbach, Stern, & Creevy, 2014;Fanti et al, 2013;Gill & Stickle, 2016;Meehan, Maughan, Cecil, & Barker, 2016). In addition, females with a psychopathic personality, especially secondary psychopathy, may be more pathological and aggressive (Falkenbach et al, 2017), and show less physical aggression but more relational aggression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms (Colins et al, 2016) than males.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%