Handbook of Strategic Alliances 2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781452231075.n10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interorganizational Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
100
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We define it as relational competence, a bundle of attitudes, the organizational routines and capabilities necessary to: establish a partnership and prepare the framework for it; lead common activities and control their effects; manage knowledge creation and exchange between partners, communicate effectively, solve problems and integrate partnering firms on inter-organizational, interpersonal and inter-team level [Sulimowska-Formowicz 2015]. Some of these capabilities are tools for inter-and intra-organizational trust-building They may be helpful in the process of the minimization of uncertainty and the elimination of double contingency risk [Hakansson et al 2009;Zaheer, Lofstrom, and George 2003]. Similarly to interpersonal trust, organizational trust may be analyzed two-dimensionally according to its sources.…”
Section: Organizational Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define it as relational competence, a bundle of attitudes, the organizational routines and capabilities necessary to: establish a partnership and prepare the framework for it; lead common activities and control their effects; manage knowledge creation and exchange between partners, communicate effectively, solve problems and integrate partnering firms on inter-organizational, interpersonal and inter-team level [Sulimowska-Formowicz 2015]. Some of these capabilities are tools for inter-and intra-organizational trust-building They may be helpful in the process of the minimization of uncertainty and the elimination of double contingency risk [Hakansson et al 2009;Zaheer, Lofstrom, and George 2003]. Similarly to interpersonal trust, organizational trust may be analyzed two-dimensionally according to its sources.…”
Section: Organizational Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensive scholarly work has been done (Ping Li, 2007) on trust in the domain of organisational management and strategic alliance (Gambetta, 1988;Inkpen and Currall, 2004;Koza and Lewin, 1998;Rousseau et al, 1998;Zaheer and Harris, 2006), relatively little attention has been paid to this construct in the marketing domain (Arnott, 2007) with the result that much less is known about trust in the context of financial services. With the exception of empirical work mostly focusing around the attributes of trustees i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly to the highly prolific research on long-term interfirm cooperation such as joint ventures, the effects of trust on economic performance are still far from clear (Dirks & Ferrin, 2001). Accordingly, trust has become one of the most frequently cited concepts in studies of cooperative interorganizational relationships (Grandori & Soda, 1995;Rao & Schmidt, 1998;Arnott, 2007;Zaheer & Harris, 2006). Yet it is only relatively recently that interorganizational trust has come to be acknowledged as a distinct construct, with previous research focusing on trust in isolated dyads without due consideration of its organizational context (Currall & Inkpen, 2002;Ferrin et al, 2006; but see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%