2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interorganizational Projects: Reexamining Innovation Implementation via IPD Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bygballe et al (2015) examine implementation and experiences when studying the interplay between formal and informal contracting in five integrated project delivery projects. Esther Paik et al (2017) examined the construction industry's use of integrated project delivery as an innovative method of planning, designing, and building construction projects via inter-organisational teams. Rowlinson (2017) present the process changes required by building information modelling (BIM) and integrated project delivery.…”
Section: Integrated Project Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bygballe et al (2015) examine implementation and experiences when studying the interplay between formal and informal contracting in five integrated project delivery projects. Esther Paik et al (2017) examined the construction industry's use of integrated project delivery as an innovative method of planning, designing, and building construction projects via inter-organisational teams. Rowlinson (2017) present the process changes required by building information modelling (BIM) and integrated project delivery.…”
Section: Integrated Project Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of IPD is expected to enhance team performance quality (Ghassemi & Becerik-Gerber, 2011), improve team trust (Chiocchio et al, 2011), and eliminate barriers that might impede information sharing in teams (Dyer & Nobeoka, 2000). Such enhancements and improvements, however, are thought to be dependent on successful team information sharing and competent project management communication behaviors (Manata et al, 2018;Mollaoglu-Korkmaz et al, 2013;Mollaoglu-Korkmaz et al, 2014;Paik et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2015). Both of these dynamics are reviewed in greater detail as follows.…”
Section: Multiorganizational Collaborations and Ipdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To wit, given the inherent complexity of IPD projects, project team members and managers must emphasize the importance of early goal definition for the purposes of assuring goal alignment, project quality, and overall effectiveness (e.g., see Zhang & Hu, 2018). In addition, project managers coordinate the internal activities of team members and monitor the team's external environment (Mollaoglu-Korkmaz et al, 2013;Mollaoglu-Korkmaz et al, 2014;Paik et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2015). For example, one challenge faced by project managers is managing members from different disciplines and with different technical skills (Ajmal & Koskinen, 2008;Cohen & Levinthal, 1990).…”
Section: Project Managers' Communication Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations