2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rai.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interorganisational social capital and innovation: a multiple case study in wine producers networks in Serra Gaúcha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Interorganizational cooperation is a field of inquiry that is most commonly viewed among economics, sociology, and organization theories, such as transaction cost economics, agency theory, the resource-based view, social network theory, social exchange theory, organizational learning, and the resource dependency theory (Salancik 1995;Fhionnlaoich 1999;Nahapiet 2009;Pouwels and Koster 2017). Although most of the research is concerned with cooperation and the existence of social capital among privately owned firms, commercial and industrial networks and clusters (Gabbay and Leenders 2001;Koka and Prescott 2002;McEvily and Zaheer 2004;Inkpen and Tsang 2005;Mu et al 2008;Pérez-Luño et al 2009;Macke et al 2010;Tomlinson 2012;Neale et al 2013;Faccin et al 2017;Ortiz et al 2018), interorganizational cooperation, and the inquiry into the existence of social capital among third-sector organizations and social enterprises, in particular, seem to be researched to a lesser degree, with few references, as far as the English literature is concerned (Nahapiet 2009;Weber et al 2013;Cambell and Sacchetti 2014;Zollo et al 2016;Hai 2017;Arenas et al 2020;Saz-Gil et al 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interorganizational cooperation is a field of inquiry that is most commonly viewed among economics, sociology, and organization theories, such as transaction cost economics, agency theory, the resource-based view, social network theory, social exchange theory, organizational learning, and the resource dependency theory (Salancik 1995;Fhionnlaoich 1999;Nahapiet 2009;Pouwels and Koster 2017). Although most of the research is concerned with cooperation and the existence of social capital among privately owned firms, commercial and industrial networks and clusters (Gabbay and Leenders 2001;Koka and Prescott 2002;McEvily and Zaheer 2004;Inkpen and Tsang 2005;Mu et al 2008;Pérez-Luño et al 2009;Macke et al 2010;Tomlinson 2012;Neale et al 2013;Faccin et al 2017;Ortiz et al 2018), interorganizational cooperation, and the inquiry into the existence of social capital among third-sector organizations and social enterprises, in particular, seem to be researched to a lesser degree, with few references, as far as the English literature is concerned (Nahapiet 2009;Weber et al 2013;Cambell and Sacchetti 2014;Zollo et al 2016;Hai 2017;Arenas et al 2020;Saz-Gil et al 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studi mengenai hubungan Relationa Capital dan EO telah dilakukan beberapa ahli. Faccin et al, (2017) melakukan penelitian pada dua asosiasi perusahaan produsen anggur di Brasil. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan mendistribusikan kuesioner dan wawancara terhadap 109 responden.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Based on "Human Centered Design" methods and tools such as those proposed in (IDEO.org, 2015), (Lockton, Harrison and Stanton, 2010) and (van Boeijen, 2015), each criteria was transformed into an basic design question at product level (Table 2). The analysis of the BoP was based on the concept of "Social Capital" initially proposed by Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998) and retaken by Vallejos et al (2008), Faccin, Genari andMacke (2017). Frugal innovation definitions argue a close relationship between BoP characteristics and frugal product design.…”
Section: Identification Of Frugal Design Criteria and Bop Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%