2020
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10090730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver Variability in the Assessment of Tumor Budding in pT 3/4 Colon Cancer: Improvement by Supporting Immunohistochemistry?

Abstract: The prognostic significance of tumor budding in colon cancer is unequivocally documented, and the recommendations of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) are currently the accepted basis for its assessment. Up to now, it is unknown whether the general use of a supporting cytokeratin immunohistochemistry can improve the interobserver variability and prognostic significance. Six investigators with different levels of experience reassessed 229 cases of colon carcinoma (pT3/4, N+/−, M0) wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations of the tumor border configuration (as defined by Jass) indicated suboptimal interobserver agreement [ 6 ]. Tumor budding might also have considerable interobserver variability [ 15 , 29 , 42 , 43 ]. However, the tumor–stroma ratio indicated a similarly low interobserver variability as SARIFA, and the assessment was also relatively simple and quick (<2 min) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations of the tumor border configuration (as defined by Jass) indicated suboptimal interobserver agreement [ 6 ]. Tumor budding might also have considerable interobserver variability [ 15 , 29 , 42 , 43 ]. However, the tumor–stroma ratio indicated a similarly low interobserver variability as SARIFA, and the assessment was also relatively simple and quick (<2 min) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For histological evaluation, H&E staining was done to observe the colonic histology differences by the method of Martin B [27]. Moreover, the H&E results were observed 1.…”
Section: Morphological and Histological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%