2006
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver agreement on classifying endoscopic diagnoses of nonerosive esophagitis

Abstract: Interobserver agreement on the endoscopic diagnosis of nonerosive esophagitis (grades M and N) is too low to be of clinical value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each patient had the esophagus examined for at least 1 minute using CVE and immediately thereafter using FICE (Fujinon EPX-4400) for a further 1 minute or more. Channel 4 was selected because it is generally deemed the best wavelength for this assessment (1,3) . The length and circumference of lesions were measured both with and without FICE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patient had the esophagus examined for at least 1 minute using CVE and immediately thereafter using FICE (Fujinon EPX-4400) for a further 1 minute or more. Channel 4 was selected because it is generally deemed the best wavelength for this assessment (1,3) . The length and circumference of lesions were measured both with and without FICE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grade M is defined as minimal changes to the esophageal mucosa, such as reddish erythema and/or whitish turbidity [12]. Although the definition of reflux esophagitis depends on the individual study, GERD defined as LA classification grade A or more, termed ''erosive esophagitis,'' could exclude interobserver bias because of the extremely poor agreement in the endoscopic diagnosis of grade M [14,15].…”
Section: Terminology Used In Gerd Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because interobserver agreement on grade M is extremely poor, [14,15] and because the two large studies [29,30] combined cases of grade C and grade D, and because the LA classification for grade C and grade D was revised in 1999, [60] we analyzed the severity of erosive esophagitis as grade A, grade B, and grade C ? D. A total of 9782 cases with erosive esophagitis were analyzed.…”
Section: Terminology Used In Gerd Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflux esophagitis was diagnosed and graded according to the Los Angeles classification (grade A-D) (16). This study excluded grade M (minimal change) because of low interobserver and intraobserver agreements (17). Hiatal hernia was defined as an apparent separation of the esophagogastric junction and diaphragm impression by more than 2 cm at endoscopy.…”
Section: Endoscopic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%