2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver agreement for estrogen receptor immunohistochemical analysis in breast cancer: a comparison of manual and computer-assisted scoring methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
58
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While ER and PR scores were assessed; only nuclear expression was concerned (Lester et al, 2009;Hammond et al, 2010) and for ER staining of >10% of tumor nuclei was considered positive. PR expression was considered to be positive if the nuclei of more than 1% of cells were stained positive (Diaz et al, 2004;Fisher et al, 2005). HER2 score assessment was made according to intensities and the proportions of the cells which showed membrane staining (Lester et al, 2009;Gutierrez and Schiff, 2011).…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ER and PR scores were assessed; only nuclear expression was concerned (Lester et al, 2009;Hammond et al, 2010) and for ER staining of >10% of tumor nuclei was considered positive. PR expression was considered to be positive if the nuclei of more than 1% of cells were stained positive (Diaz et al, 2004;Fisher et al, 2005). HER2 score assessment was made according to intensities and the proportions of the cells which showed membrane staining (Lester et al, 2009;Gutierrez and Schiff, 2011).…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to a cut-off value for Er evaluation by computerized image analysis, 10% of positive cells (9,16,20), the h-score (15) and aQua scores calculated by the average signal intensity divided by compartment area (18) were used in previous reports. although in the present study the allred score determined by human examiners was compared to the h-score calculated by the computer and the allred/h-score conversion table was shown in a previous report (26), it was difficult to translate one scoring system to the other system, precisely since the two systems are not strictly equivalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in particular, automated image analysis technology, including aQua (18), ariol (14,19) and matlab7 using digital image capturing (20), has recently been developed. although it is emphasized that computerized image analysis has improved quantification, reproducibility and interobserver variability for the hr evaluation of breast carcinoma (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), the process…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esta dificuldade é ainda agravada pelo fato de que estes últimos também incluem um importante componente subjetivo como a determinação de campos e a definição do espectro colorimétrico a ser empregado. Mesmo considerando estas ressalvas, nossa experiência com a análise digital neste trabalho mostrou-se aparentemente confiável e coerente, confirmando os relatos favoráveis de outros estudos que utilizaram este recurso 18,19,20 . Assim sendo, concluímos não ser possível confirmar a partir deste estudo a hipótese de que os níveis de expressão imunoistoquímica da proteína VEGF nos carcinomas colorretais são maiores nos tumores com presença de metástase em linfonodos regionais, utilizando-se uma Matriz de Amostras Teciduais e análise de imagens assistida por computador.…”
Section: Grupounclassified