2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study of older adolescents, approximately 50% of the time students were online, they were engaged in more than 1 activity. 10 …”
Section: Media Use Estimates How Are Media Usage Patterns Changing Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study of older adolescents, approximately 50% of the time students were online, they were engaged in more than 1 activity. 10 …”
Section: Media Use Estimates How Are Media Usage Patterns Changing Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A current issue associated with technology usage is multitasking or task switching (Moreno et al, 2012b;Rosen et al, 2013b). Given that in previous research this activity seems to relate to technology usage, it is useful to assess people's attitude toward either completing one task before moving to another or working on one task and then switching to another before its completion.…”
Section: Assessment Of Media and Technology Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These students judged themselves to be less attentive during the lecture and to attain lower academic performance levels than other students [55{Golub, 2010 #23, 56]. It was also found that the self-assessments of students on failure to complete homework correlated significantly with their high usage of instant messaging software and specific types of multi-tasking activities [57] [31] [58]. Moreover, these behaviours interfered with schoolwork and was negatively related to overall college grade point average (GPA) performance [18] [59].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%