2018
DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-3-252-255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet-technology as a Human Body Extension: Social-Philosophical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E. Erikson's (2006) theoretical constructions are considered the most profound and reliable study of the regulatory function of identification in the formation of a person's ideas about him/herself and about the sequence of his/her behaviour in the surrounding reality. The special significance of substantiating new behavioural forms of student identification due to the University digital educational reality can be traced in a significant number of modern authors' studies (Asmolov, 2009;Attali, 2017;Bekarev, 2009;Gubanova, 2018;Deleuze & Guattari, 2017;Zaitsev & Nogina, 2018;Crang, 2000;Poleva, 2018;Tikhonov, 2013). The research notes that to date, the justification of new behavioural forms of student identification does not fully correspond to the stated imperatives of the University digital educational reality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…E. Erikson's (2006) theoretical constructions are considered the most profound and reliable study of the regulatory function of identification in the formation of a person's ideas about him/herself and about the sequence of his/her behaviour in the surrounding reality. The special significance of substantiating new behavioural forms of student identification due to the University digital educational reality can be traced in a significant number of modern authors' studies (Asmolov, 2009;Attali, 2017;Bekarev, 2009;Gubanova, 2018;Deleuze & Guattari, 2017;Zaitsev & Nogina, 2018;Crang, 2000;Poleva, 2018;Tikhonov, 2013). The research notes that to date, the justification of new behavioural forms of student identification does not fully correspond to the stated imperatives of the University digital educational reality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors consider the question about the educational entity identification of the student to be open: is this phenomenon one of the conditions of the educational process, an integral element of the educational environment or the educational model of the University in which the main role is played not so much by the subject content as the resources of digital technology, initiating the emergence of new behavioural forms of identification. Proponents of digitalization of the University educational reality (Asmolov, 2009;Gubanova, 2018;Zaitsev & Nogina, 2018;Kozyrkov, 2010;Russell & Holmes, 1996;Tikhonov, 2013) prove its priority importance in updating the educational process. The authors consider the digital environment as an educational reality in which new behavioural forms of student identification are implemented.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations