2016
DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2016.1222298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet mediation and the family gap: explorative ethnographic interviews in new family forms in Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For most parents, these practices amounted to finding ways to give their teenage son or daughter a certain level of autonomy, for instance, by providing space for discussion, looking for ways to reach a common agreement, establishing a climate of trust, explaining the rationale behind decisions, and relying on monitoring rather than proactive restrictions. This finding is also in line with previous research that has suggested that Belgian families find a balance between enabling and restrictive mediation (Mostmans, 2016;Symons et al, 2017;Zaman et al, 2016) and that in families characterized by a harmonious relationship between parents and children, parents are more likely to explain the rationale for their media education and to monitor their children's digital media use (Padilla-Walker et al, 2012). Many Western parents initiate discussions with their teens and monitor their online use without necessarily intervening, which is likely to afford autonomy and selfcorrective behaviors (Wisniewski et al, 2015, p. 312).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For most parents, these practices amounted to finding ways to give their teenage son or daughter a certain level of autonomy, for instance, by providing space for discussion, looking for ways to reach a common agreement, establishing a climate of trust, explaining the rationale behind decisions, and relying on monitoring rather than proactive restrictions. This finding is also in line with previous research that has suggested that Belgian families find a balance between enabling and restrictive mediation (Mostmans, 2016;Symons et al, 2017;Zaman et al, 2016) and that in families characterized by a harmonious relationship between parents and children, parents are more likely to explain the rationale for their media education and to monitor their children's digital media use (Padilla-Walker et al, 2012). Many Western parents initiate discussions with their teens and monitor their online use without necessarily intervening, which is likely to afford autonomy and selfcorrective behaviors (Wisniewski et al, 2015, p. 312).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, Mostmans et al (2014) found that children were actually very careful when posting pictures of others online that could be embarrassing or hurtful. In other research, Mostmans (2016) showed how children even question parental authority when it comes to sharing pictures that are of their concern. To manage privacy Kumar et al (2017) found three main strategies.…”
Section: Children and Privacy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En los comienzos del desarrollo de la noción de mediación parental, la literatura se orientó hacia las actividades que los padres realizaban para regular el consumo de televisión de sus hijos (Austin, 1993;Banks & Gupta, 1980;Nathanson, 2001Nathanson, , 2002Pereira, 1998;Warren, 2005). Luego, con la aparición de nuevos medios de comunicación, con la multiplicación de las pantallas dentro de los hogares y los procesos de individualización y de miniaturización de los dispositivos, la mediación parental se desplazó de la televisión hacia todas las otras pantallas del hogar (Pasquier et al, 2012;Mostmans, 2016;Mesch, 2009y Duek & Moguillansky, 2020.…”
Section: Antecedentes Sobre Mediaciones Parentalesunclassified